Show newer

FWIW, I thought was pretty awful, not really worth watching, but I made it to the end to say I gave it a full shot, as is my way.

It was a mess of bad dialog, flat characters without arcs, poor decisions without consequences, inconsistencies, and maybe worst of all, the great reveal of , built up to be the smartest tactician ever, as a bumbling fool.

So many of the characters reminded me of the old review of "This comes across as dumb people writing what they think smart people are like."

I thought was really good. Ahsoka was just a superficial, vapid miss of an opportunity.

volkris boosted

"Running a successful open source project is just Good Will Hunting in reverse, where you start out as a respected genius and end up being a janitor who gets into fights." - Bryne Hobart

volkris boosted

There is no law stating that the Speaker of the House has to be human. Scientists estimate that 20 quadrillion ants live on Earth. One of them has to have the right stuff.

volkris boosted
volkris boosted

just a reminder that the Nobel Prizes are being announced this week so if you get a phone call from country code +46, don't let it go to voice mail or they'll move along to the next best person.

volkris boosted

The justices often get pigeon-holed as "conservative" or "liberal", but political scientist John Tures says that's too simplistic.

Typically, over half of decisions each term (which may be the less controversial and publicized ones) are decided unanimously or 8-1.

theconversation.com/supreme-co

#uspolitics #USPol #SCOTUS (2 of 3)

Show thread

One step forward: mainstream conservatives today intensely criticizing last night's Republican debate as a mess of people yelling over each other instead of expressing positions and exploring matters of substance.

Two steps backwards: the exact same individuals celebrating that it's the rolling around in the mud moments that let you really figure out who the candidate really is.

Well, it's not just conservatives of the moment: throughout the political environment, across the political spectrum we see people bashing bad outcomes before supporting exactly the elements that brought us to the place and promote it into the future.

We get the government we ask for. We need to stop asking for such socially unhealthy things.

We can't put all the blame on politicians for doing what we empowered them to do, and reelected them for doing.

The dysfunction will continue so long as we keep reelecting politicians promising dysfunction.

Never forget the feedback effect of negative things filling a vacuum when positive things are removed.

Whether that's in politics or business or information platforms.

So many good people left and demanded that other good people also leave the platform, so there should be no surprise that the platform shows more bad actors now.

But it's a case of complaining how the game is going after deciding not to play anymore.

Ars Technica  
Musk’s X spreads more disinformation than rival social networks, EU says Twitter/X left voluntary alliance but is "not off the hook," EU official s...

Sounds like the writer's strike is raising the issue of requiring an arbitrary minimal number of writers to be involved in a production, which just makes me think about the phrase "designed by committee."

It's not supposed to be a positive phrase, so making the committee arbitrarily larger doesn't inspire confidence in the eventual work.

Contrary to news reports, according to the CRS status table, no, the hasn't passed its appropriations bills while the dilly-dallies.

crsreports.congress.gov/Approp

It seems the story that disabled to sabotage has been disputed by the author who was the original source for the whole thing.

This is why rushes to judgment based on sensational headlines are so unhealthy.

twitter.com/WalterIsaacson/sta

volkris boosted

i'll never get over the intense special interest required for someone to post this on imdb

@thisven

The paid option is intended to make money :)

But to be serious, blue checkmarks always had a vanity element to them, so they were offered for whatever purpose a users wanted them.

If users are interested in paying for blue checks for whatever reason the individual user may want one, Twitter is happy to take their money.

None of that has impact on other options for identity verification, though, if one wants to pursue it.

@briankrebs @jerry

Tapper declaring that it sounds like the Secretary of State is engaging in drama doesn't make it true, but it does create plenty of clickbait in the press.

It should always be a red flag when a reporter or a reporter's actions or statements get more coverage than the actual officials or experts they're supposedly reporting on.

Sadly, reporters like this have found profit in doing that stuff, promoting drama where it doesn't exist, and generally misleading news consumers.

If it really sounds to Tapper that doesn't want to risk offending over then I'm thinking Tapper might be in the wrong job, because he seems to be projecting his own drama into the reporting.

volkris boosted

@AGHamilton29: "This is framed as if recusal would be expected in such circumstances, which is insane and ridiculous.

If Judges had to recuse just because they had interactions with lawyers involved in cases before them, you would run out of eligible judges rather quickly.

#SCOTUS #Alito

twitter.com/AGHamilton29/statu

(H/T @mkhammer RT )

volkris boosted

Techbros: self driving cars are inevitable!

Also techbros: prove you are human by performing a task that computers can’t do, like identifying traffic lights.

For people interested in this episode of Daily Podcast is pretty short and informative.

Briefly, it looks at the evolving divide among / party members and notably how the more aligned side has come to focus on politics primarily as a tool for attacking enemies, not building anything up.

This is important for a few reasons, both to understand them so as to figure out how to react to them AND as a way of predicting how things will work out, since that approach has little traction in the broader public.

Trump was elected by a coalition of different groups with vastly different, often contradictory interests. This evolution utterly breaks the coalition, though.

cato.org/multimedia/cato-daily

volkris boosted
Maybe someone can send @Ryan Barrett some data on #Zot to add that to the comparison.

Ryan Barrett wrote the following post Tue, 05 Sep 2023 10:28:02 +0200 Threw together a comparison of the four decentralized social protocols I know best: IndieWeb, ActivityPub, ATProto, Nostr. Obviously oversimplified, hopefully still useful! Preview below, click through for full table with links.

I tried to focus on how these protocols are currently deployed and used in the real world. For example, identity in ActivityPub is technically URL-based, but in practice the fediverse uses WebFinger user@domain identifiers more or less universally, so the table reflects that.

Feedback is welcome!
volkris boosted

I'm not surprised to hear a report like this...

Lauren Weinstein  
Every so often I take a serious look at the code running my #Mastodon instance and I start to get a headache so I stop looking at it.
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.