note: I don't actually care if you think this is AI posted. I thought parts of it were amusing. AI or otherwise. I saw it on facebook, I personally didn't post this on facebook. and because we have children who want to act like their two, here's the original facebook URL: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=122384516228009609&id=61550288282980 Feel free to block me if you want, I don't actually care. My bio says it all, If something I say/post/repost offends you, don't let the door hit you on the way out. This is simply The random shit I see on Facebook when I check it once in in an age! The man across the aisle thought the airplane Wi-Fi network was a distress signal.
And for about four minutes, I honestly understood why.
This happened on an Alaska Airlines flight from San Francisco to Portland, which is usually the kind of flight where everyone has either a Patagonia jacket, a laptop, or a reusable water bottle that looks like it has been on more hikes than I have.
I was in 12C.
Aisle seat.
Across from me in 12D was a man in his early sixties with reading glasses, a newspaper, and the intense energy of someone who still prints hotel confirmations.
He seemed nice.
A little serious.
The kind of man who says “the internet” like it’s a location.
We took off.
Totally normal.
Seatbelt sign went off.
People opened laptops.
Someone two rows up immediately started watching a movie without headphones, because apparently society is fragile.
I pulled out my phone to connect to the Wi-Fi.
That’s when the man across the aisle leaned over.
Him: “Excuse me.”
Me: “Yeah?”
Him: “Do you see that?”
Me: “See what?”
Him: “On the Wi-Fi.”
I looked at my phone.
There were several networks.
Alaska_WiFi.
Alaska_Guest.
Somebody’s hotspot called “NotYourHotspot.”
And one that said:
HELP_IM_STUCK_ON_A_PLANE
I stared at it.
He stared at it.
Then he whispered, “That seems bad.”
To be fair.
It did seem bad.
Me: “I think that’s probably somebody’s phone hotspot.”
Him: “Why would someone name it that?”
Me: “Because people are strange.”
Him: “Should we tell someone?”
Me: “I don’t think so.”
Him: “It says help.”
Now the woman in 12E, next to him, looks over.
Woman: “What says help?”
Him: “The Wi-Fi.”
Woman: “The Wi-Fi says help?”
Me: “A hotspot says help.”
Woman: “That feels different from regular help.”
The man holds up his phone like it’s evidence in a trial.
Him: “Look.”
Woman: “Oh.”
Me: “It’s probably a joke.”
Him: “Probably?”
Me: “Most likely.”
Woman: “I don’t love ‘most likely’ at 30,000 feet.”
Now the guy behind me leans forward.
Behind guy: “Did someone say help?”
Me: “No.”
Him: “The Wi-Fi did.”
Behind guy: “The Wi-Fi asked for help?”
Me: “The Wi-Fi did not ask for help. Someone named their hotspot weird.”
A college student across the aisle takes out one AirPod.
College student: “What’s the hotspot called?”
The man shows him.
College student: “Oh, that’s hilarious.”
Him: “It is not hilarious.”
College student: “It kind of is.”
Woman: “Could it be a crew code?”
Me: “I really don’t think the crew is using public Wi-Fi names to communicate.”
Behind guy: “You never know.”
This is how it spreads.
One concerned man.
One weird hotspot name.
One row of people with too much imagination.
Within sixty seconds, rows 11 through 13 are aware that someone’s phone is named HELP_IM_STUCK_ON_A_PLANE.
The flight attendant walks by with a trash bag.
The man raises his hand.
Him: “Excuse me.”
Flight attendant: “Yes?”
Him: “There’s something on the Wi-Fi.”
Flight attendant: “Okay.”
Him: “It says help.”
Flight attendant: “The Wi-Fi says help?”
Me: “It’s a hotspot.”
Flight attendant: “Ah.”
Him: “Do you know whose it is?”
Flight attendant: “No, sir.”
Him: “Shouldn’t we find out?”
Flight attendant: “I’m going to guess someone thought they were funny.”
The college student raises his hand slightly.
College student: “To be fair, they were.”
The man does not appreciate this.
Him: “What if someone is actually stuck?”
Flight attendant: “Sir, we are all technically stuck on the plane.”
College student: “That’s the joke.”
I had to look down.
I could not laugh.
The flight attendant stayed very calm.
Flight attendant: “I’ll make a quick announcement, okay?”
Him: “Thank you.”
Me: “Oh no.”
Woman: “This is going to get worse.”
The flight attendant walked to the front.
A second later, the speaker clicked on.
Flight attendant: “Ladies and gentlemen, we have a small request. If your phone hotspot is named HELP_IM_STUCK_ON_A_PLANE, could you please rename it or turn it off? It is causing some concern in row 12.”
Silence.
Then half the plane started laughing.
Not quiet laughing.
Full-body, Sunday-night-airport-exhaustion laughing.
A hand slowly went up in row 18.
A guy in a beanie yelled, “My bad!”
The flight attendant looked down the aisle.
Flight attendant: “Thank you, sir.”
The man across the aisle turned bright red.
Him: “I was just being cautious.”
Me: “Honestly, fair.”
Woman: “It did say help.”
College student: “And we were on a plane.”
The guy from row 18 walked up later to use the bathroom and stopped by our row.
Beanie guy: “Sorry about that.”
Him: “You named your phone that?”
Beanie guy: “My brother did it last Thanksgiving and I forgot.”
Him: “For months?”
Beanie guy: “I don’t use hotspot much.”
Woman: “Your brother has caused aviation confusion.”
Beanie guy: “He’d be proud.”
The serious man looked like he wanted to be mad, but couldn’t fully get there.
Him: “You should change it.”
Beanie guy: “Already did.”
Me: “What is it now?”
Beanie guy: “Definitely_Not_A_Distress_Signal.”
The college student almost fell out of his seat.
The man just stared.
Him: “That is not better.”
Flight attendant, passing by: “It is a little better.”
After that, the whole section relaxed.
The man across the aisle eventually smiled, just a little.
He folded his newspaper, looked at me, and said, “I suppose I overreacted.”
Me: “Maybe a little.”
Woman: “But if it had been real, you would’ve been the hero.”
College student: “Row 12: cybersecurity division.”
Him: “I am not in cybersecurity.”
Me: “You are now.”
For the rest of the flight, every time the flight attendant passed, she gave him updates.
Flight attendant: “No further Wi-Fi emergencies.”
Him: “Very funny.”
Flight attendant: “We remain safely connected.”
Him: “You’re enjoying this.”
Flight attendant: “A little.”
When we landed in Portland, people stood up immediately because apparently airplane seats become lava after touchdown.
The guy from row 18 walked past us.
Beanie guy: “Safe travels, row 12.”
College student: “Stay vigilant.”
Woman: “Rename your phone.”
Him: “Please.”
As we walked off the plane, the flight attendant stood by the door.
She looked at the man and said, “Thank you for protecting the network.”
He tried not to smile.
Failed.
Him: “Somebody had to.”
And honestly?
He wasn’t wrong.
Because most of us saw a weird Wi-Fi name and thought, “That’s dumb.”
He saw it and thought, “Not on my watch.”
A little dramatic?
Yes.
But somewhere between San Francisco and Portland, one retired-looking guy with a newspaper briefly became the self-appointed sheriff of airplane Wi-Fi.
And I respect that.
I often write about #USpol, but until today, I had never thought to browse the hashtag.
Friends, that is not a high-quality hashtag. Lots of nonsense, conspiracy theories, incoherent rambling, and misguided anger. I didn't encounter anything right-wing or conservative. I don't know if it's because those people avoid the Fediverse, eschew the hashtag, or are effectively blocked by my instance.
It's sad to find so many people on "my side" are not the brightest bulbs in life's marquee.
#BrianKilmeade ― Sure Trump's war against Iran might have been a mistake, and maybe mistakes were made when it comes to the Strait of Hormuz, but what matters is how you come back from mistakes! Now he just needs to bomb the hell out of Iran to keep them from declaring a victory! #USPolitics #Iran
Sometimes Trump's most ardent supporters admit that the guy has a pattern of hitching himself to whatever cause looks like it's already going to win, so he can claim the success of other people.
The primary results from yesterday seem to be a fine example of that.
Sometimes the conservative talk show hosts setting US policy outright say they don't know what's going on.
But hey, ignorance never stops them.
Still it's fun to highlight these moments to reinforce that there's no grant conspiracy here, just a bunch of people who don't know how the world works fiddling with the controls.
[Josh Blackman] The KBJ Delay in Callais https://reason.com/volokh/2026/05/05/the-kbj-delay-in-callais/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon
#ClayAndBuck, explicitly: Spirit Airlines went out of business because of something Elizabeth Warren said and absolutely not because their fuel prices shot up due to Trump's war. And also, let's sort all of us into airline teams based on which one each of us flies. #USPolitics
Sadly, this keeps coming up in case after case on this topic: NO the courts didn't ban mailing of abortion pills, and the banning of abortion pills is not what's going up to the Supreme Court.
What happened was that the FDA seems to admit that it acted in violation of law, and courts are grappling with how to respond to likely illegal agency actions as the legal process moves forward.
All of this other stuff surrounding RvW and abortion access are secondary to the core case about an agency acting illegally.
And that's acting illegal in the context of drug regulation at that. It's probably kind of imporant! but getting lost in the drama and sensational political rhetoric.
This is the mindset of the children that drove #Trump into office and continue to support him even now.
They don't understand anything past the most superficial, "He spends time with me so he must like me!" level. And they apply this to international foreign policy.
They believe flattery must be honest, and this example shows that they think that way.
It's unfortunate, but so many people with STRONG opinions on and reactions to the SCOTUS ruling on districting aren't familiar with either the background of the case or what the ruling actually said.
That's understandable as so many influencers are writing completely false stories on background and analysis.
Start with the background. LA drew a map but was ordered by a lower court to draw a new one. So it did. And then a different lower court said it could not draw a new one. It both could and could not act based on the exact same legal reasoning.
THIS is the mess the SCOTUS needed to clean up. VRA was already unworkable long before this case.
The big argument surrounding Temporary Protected Status is that the home countries remain as dangerous as before and so the administration can't legally send folks back to it.
In making this admission these major #MAGA commentators give up the game. They immediately lose the case.
And here they feel so smug about how they're obviously in the right.
They have no idea how any of this government stuff actually works.
So often the influential #MAGA outfits come THIS CLOSE to facing the contradictions in their perspectives...
Intellectual maturity would have them reconsider their assumptions when faced with unexepected outcomes.
Well, that's idiocracy for you.
So often the influential #MAGA outfits come THIS CLOSE to facing the contradictions in their perspectives...
Intellectual maturity would have them reconsider their assumptions when faced with unexepected outcomes.
Well, that's idiocracy for you.
It took Trump's people way too long to discover the phrase "nuclear dust" but here we are.
For all these weeks they had to grapple with the contradiction where he totally and completely destroyed Iran's nuclear program, but now the US needs to go spend serious resources because Iran's nuclear program continues.
If only someone had thought of "nuclear dust" weeks ago they could have squared that circle.
Trump "failed to implement any of his major policy initiatives through executive order in any realistic sense. Think about the Alien Enemies Act, federalizing the National Guard, worldwide tariffs, birthright citizenship. These are the main pillars of Donald Trump’s policy presidency, the substantive aspects of it. And they’ve all failed":
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/16/opinion/supreme-court-trump.html
copy: @renewedresistance #politics #SCOTUS #HumanRights
#Trump often acts from a paternalistic mindset.
There's a trope of a father threatening, Do x or I'll do it for you, as in, Shut your mouth or I'll shut it for you.
Well I think Trump gets this one backwards.
His latest rhetoric seems to be, Open the straight or I'll close it for you!
Siiiigh
I really do think he sees himself as something like a father to all, someone to give everybody advice and take care of everybody and end all the suffering and all of the other stuff.
He's just a really bad father though.
#Trump often acts from a paternalistic mindset.
There's a trope of a father threatening, Do x or I'll do it for you, as in, Shut your mouth or I'll shut it for you.
Well I think Trump gets this one backwards.
His latest rhetoric seems to be, Open the straight or I'll close it for you!
Siiiigh
I really do think he sees himself as something like a father to all, someone to give everybody advice and take care of everybody and end all the suffering and all of the other stuff.
He's just a really bad father though.
Conservatives trying to square their circles...
MAGA, for years: #Iran is a death cult. They don't value life, and 42 virgins and etc.
MAGA, today: Why doesn't the death cult bow to our demands as we threaten death?
I think the most pressing and fundamental problem of the day is that people lack a practically effective means of sorting out questions of fact in the larger world. We can hardly begin to discuss ways of addressing reality if we can't agree what reality even is, after all.
The institutions that have served this role in the past have dropped the ball, so the next best solution is talking to each other, particularly to those who disagree, to sort out conflicting claims.
Unfortunately, far too many actively oppose this, leaving all opposing claims untested. It's very regressive.
So that's my hobby, striving to understanding the arguments of all sides at least because it's interesting to see how mythologies are formed but also because maybe through that process we can all have our beliefs tested.
But if nothing else, social media platforms like this are chances to vent frustrations that on so many issues both sides are obviously wrong ;)