@blue you're making jokes in something you do not give a shit about.

@ludivokrug@udongein.xyz why do you think I don't? And why do you think that moron does?

@blue mainly cause you think he's a moron while he don't.

@ludivokrug@udongein.xyz moron? Definitely not! people of his kind have different kind of dehumanizing labels for me like slaves, or nazies, or even fascists

@blue meanwhile the only person here giving labels and make some duhumanization is u. Think about it.

@ludivokrug@udongein.xyz dude... Lok at the picture, look at those that I sent you before from him, look at those where he goes like "all you liberals support azov battalion cuz you're nazis as well", and you keep boosting it, is it really me who need to think about it?

@blue

hhmmm.... I did not recieve any pics from u lately.

As I said you do not understand the thing you're talking about.
And thats the point. Pic from /0 is about liberals do not wanna see what the fuck Azov and other punitive battalions do.

All the liberals need is to blame their personal enemies to have possibility to crack em down in future.

There are nothing about RF imperial ambitions there.

And, yes, Azov is a nazi gang no doubt. And support nazi gang is a crime for sure. Without any excuses, even in a way support any "ukranian forces" to stand against RF invasion. Cause of Nunberg War Tribunal.

...dude.

@ludivokrug @blue
> And, yes, Azov is a nazi gang no doubt
Please try to learn about them first. That's simply not true at least for now.

@vovanium @blue sorry, but this is a learnt opinion, not from ofnews.

The way u affected of propaganda is more real.

@ludivokrug @blue Then you should have clear proof of your words.

@vovanium @blue me?

Nonono, that think do not work like that.

Maybe you can refute a well-known fact?

I'll listen carefully.

@ludivokrug @blue What "well known fact" should I refute? I don't know any evidence of them being nazi at least since "decommunisation" laws in 2015 taken effect (they actually ban national-socialism as well).
They themself openly state they're not.

@vovanium @blue
>I don't know any evidence of them being nazi
You dont know != they are not.

And yes, the level of argumentation is simply amazing.

>They themself openly state they're not.
And why should we belive this?
Follow

@ludivokrug @blue
> Level of argumentation is simply amazing
Oh yeah...
> well-known fact
Argumentum ad populum
> You dont know != they are not
Argmentum ad ignorantiam
> And why should we believe this?
Don't you know about presumption of innocence?
Any arguments from you?

@vovanium @blue

You still haven't given a single argument ("I don't know" is NOT an argument), and you're already demanding that I refute well-known fact. At the same time, fact is "not well-known" for you, which seems to suggest whether it makes sense to communicate with a person who even is not able (or just don't want his fictional picture of the world to fall) to open Google and just search a bit.

@ludivokrug @blue
Argumentum ad hominem.
You claim they nazi so you should give an argument, not me.

@vovanium @blue

,ou came to the thread, challenged the point of view, saying that my statement is not true

try to prove that this is so, if you can, of course
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.