Hey commie! Wake up! you pooped your pants
RE: https://mastodon.social/users/yogthos/statuses/108057630408295247
@ludivokrug@udongein.xyz yep, it's me making it hard, sure)
@ludivokrug@udongein.xyz why do you think I don't? And why do you think that moron does?
@ludivokrug@udongein.xyz moron? Definitely not! people of his kind have different kind of dehumanizing labels for me like slaves, or nazies, or even fascists
@ludivokrug@udongein.xyz dude... Lok at the picture, look at those that I sent you before from him, look at those where he goes like "all you liberals support azov battalion cuz you're nazis as well", and you keep boosting it, is it really me who need to think about it?
hhmmm.... I did not recieve any pics from u lately.
As I said you do not understand the thing you're talking about.
And thats the point. Pic from /0 is about liberals do not wanna see what the fuck Azov and other punitive battalions do.
All the liberals need is to blame their personal enemies to have possibility to crack em down in future.
There are nothing about RF imperial ambitions there.
And, yes, Azov is a nazi gang no doubt. And support nazi gang is a crime for sure. Without any excuses, even in a way support any "ukranian forces" to stand against RF invasion. Cause of Nunberg War Tribunal.
...dude.
@ludivokrug @blue
> And, yes, Azov is a nazi gang no doubt
Please try to learn about them first. That's simply not true at least for now.
@ludivokrug @blue Then you should have clear proof of your words.
@ludivokrug @blue What "well known fact" should I refute? I don't know any evidence of them being nazi at least since "decommunisation" laws in 2015 taken effect (they actually ban national-socialism as well).
They themself openly state they're not.
@ludivokrug @blue
> Level of argumentation is simply amazing
Oh yeah...
> well-known fact
Argumentum ad populum
> You dont know != they are not
Argmentum ad ignorantiam
> And why should we believe this?
Don't you know about presumption of innocence?
Any arguments from you?
You still haven't given a single argument ("I don't know" is NOT an argument), and you're already demanding that I refute well-known fact. At the same time, fact is "not well-known" for you, which seems to suggest whether it makes sense to communicate with a person who even is not able (or just don't want his fictional picture of the world to fall) to open Google and just search a bit.
@ludivokrug @blue
Argumentum ad hominem.
You claim they nazi so you should give an argument, not me.
,ou came to the thread, challenged the point of view, saying that my statement is not true
try to prove that this is so, if you can, of course