3-letter org calls Anubis “a form of malware” they wouldn’t use on their site because they “want users to control their own computing”:
fsf.org/blogs/sysadmin/our-sma

This is laudable but it ignores that ① one doesn’t run the proof-of-work JS code when using eww, w3m, wget or anything that doesn’t have “Mozilla” in its user-agent string, and ② what’s at stake is availability of the service: what Anubis does isn’t great, but one has yet to come up with a better solution.

Using Anubis on a static web site may be overkill (provided other things like rate limiting are in place); however, for the database-backed services we have in Guix, where each request can be expensive, I feel like we may have to use Anubis or similar at some point:
codeberg.org/guix/maintenance/

Follow

@civodul git.gammaspectra.live/git/go-a sounds promising, given the recent FSF proclamation about the unethical flavor of Anubis

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.