Can data augmentation benefit from a separation of "online" and "target" network? BYOL's answer is yes! Furthermore, they suggest that using negative examples might be obsolete, as they achieved new SOTA without them.
First of all, they specify a fast-learning "online" network, and a slow-learning, "target" one. For a given sample the online network is trying to predict target network's embedding. The catch? They are using different augmentations!
Finally, the online network is trained using gradient descent, while target network's weights are updated by averaging them (exponential moving average) with online's weights.
Finally, the online network is trained using gradient descent, while target network's weights are updated by averaging them (exponential moving average) with online's weights.