Follow

@micchiato@mastodon.social

It should be possible to stand up in a court of law, if charged with being pro-palesinian and cite recent ICC rulings about what s happening as a breach of internaitonal law, it should also be possible to cite statemetns from the UN secretary general, then argue the fact you are pro human life, condemn the actions of Oct 7 but also strongly condemn the deaths of 40,000 civilians, cutting off food, medicine and water, and everything else that has happened.

You can also argue that pro palestine is NOT pro HAMAS.

I just wondered how much the case against you could be thrown away if a court is presented with evidence that is very uncomfortable, esp as we are talking about the deaths of babies and children, and esp those who are too young to speak, or understand the world around them.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.