Some org (who I will name after this poll ends) published this poll on Twitter (🙄). They used the results to try to validate their POV on AI theft.
Though it won’t provide meaningful research data, I am curious to see how Mastodon responds.
(Please boost so we can get good numbers. 🙌🏻)
—
Question: should openly licensed content (images, music, research, etc.) be used to train AI systems? (Reply with reasoning if you feel called.)
#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Art #Music #Copyright
I have said no, partly as a lot of academic questions require more than a yes or no answer, l they need detailed responses, you can't just answer a question without citing research and also related research, to really understand and learn a subject you need to learn it, read and comprehend the sources and be able to think critically and pull in related items of information.
Given on here, people have said Ai come up with nonsense as it is being fed nonsense along side actual peer reviewed information as well as pre review (which I think is what some of arXiv is) so there is a danger that real science will be damaged along with reputations of people.
If one is serious about undertaking research, then you should be prepared to put in the hard graft to get there.
Note: I am NOT an academic, I have undertaken a certificate in contemporary science with the open university. I have also read some of the peerreviewed books on writing academic documents or proposals (for personal interest). I also have books on writing and study skills.
