tripu

> _“As to #intent, no one can see into someone else's thoughts to know for sure.”_

Sure. That's why we have the [Principle of #Charity](en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principl) (ie, when in doubt, assume the best intentions in others).

Also, notice that the exact same proposition (“no one can see into someone else's thoughts to know for sure”) would exonerate _me_ from any accusation of #bigotry or lack of sensitivity, since I can't possibly know for sure what other people think, how they will interpret what I say, or how they will feel.

Thus (again): #context, and #PrincipleOfCharity.

5/5

Principle of charity - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org
Doc Edward Morbius ❌

The Principle of Charity: when interpreting someone’s statement, you should assume that the best possible interpretation of that statement is the one that the speaker meant to convey. Accordingly, to implement the principle of charity, you should not attribute falsehoods, logical fallacies, or irrationality to people’s argument, when there is a plausible, rational alternative available.

effectiviology.com/principle-o

#philosophy #dialectic #discussion #PrincipleOfCharity #debate

The Principle of Charity: Assume the Best Interpretation of People’s Arguments – Effectiviology

effectiviology.com