Unpopular take: I actually agree with EM about the stupid jet. Archival information is one thing, but real time is essentially the same risk-public benefit calculus as doxxing, and just as creepy. We should lean into this instead and encourage him to extend his privacy concerns to more vulnerable individuals.

@AmberWavesofFlame The thing is that he came in saying that anything that wasn't illegal would be allowed, because Freedom of Speech. Then when it impacted HIM he went back on that, without a hint of acknowledging that his initial promise was actually a bad idea and he was wrong.

(Also that information is still / already public. If we wants to do something about that, he has to talk to the FAA and Congress, not just ban some guy from Twitter.)

@AmberWavesofFlame Also he banned ALL the accounts of the guy that was posting the information, not just the one that was posting it. Which is hard to account for.

Follow

@ceoln I found one of them is @BezosJets, so the logic would be the same. Banning his personal account looks purely vindictive though, and the hypocrisy is overpowering. Which doesn’t surprise me; he’s a bundle of cognitive dissonances wrapped in layers of neurosis. But I still say the Jet accounts needed to go.

@AmberWavesofFlame I don't know; they're republishing information that's already completely public; so it's hard to say.

This wouldn't apply to tracking someone's car, or their own location, both of which aren't public information, and which I think would already be justly banned.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.