That's a good answer. I should have qualified my question (“…short of modifying the source code of humans itself?”).

Reminds me of 's “Hedonistic Imperative”.

Pat  
@tripu “Can sufficiently advanced #tech fix, or at least cancel out, the mendacity and fallibility of any mass of human beings — flaws that have...
Follow

@tripu

I wasn't familiar with Pearce and his work. I just skimmed his Wikipedia page. Eliminating all pain and suffering seems like a worthwhile goal.

I recently pondered whether consciousness could ever evolve with pain. Are there possibly conscious beings somewhere in the universe who evolved without going through some stage where pain was part of their nervous systems. How that would effect the development of a social species and things such as empathy.

@tripu

I meant to say, "I recently pondered whether consciousness could ever evolve *without* pain."

Yeah, philosophical zombies are an interesting thought experiment. I haven't really thought about it too much, but my unconsidered impression is that they could not exist. Certainly machines could be made that mimic human responses, but if something (someone) was an exact duplicate of a human, they'd have consciousness, I think.

We can now look into a working brain and see whats going on with fMRI and other tech, and going forward that will improve, so I think sometime this century we'll have some kind of an answer to the hard problem.

I think we will find that consciousness is much more pervasive, beyond just human consciousness.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.