When you hear something, always consider the source...
But even if the source is just fiction, the statement may still be true. You just can't make an assessment based solely on that fictional source.
>"It is also important to recognize the vast majority of things that fall in this middle ground are, in reality, false..."
Not sure if that's true of not, so I guess it's probably true.
(If your statement is true, then things I'm uncertain of are most likely false. Therefore, your statement should be considered false, and therefore, if uncertain facts are not most-likely false, then they either have an equal probability of true/false, or they are most-likely true, in which case the probablity woud be that they are true -- assuming equal probability of those last two suppositions. So therefore, your statement is most probably true.)
I'm sure all of this is thoroughly covered in "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" (a work of fiction).
I provided a source in my toot.
@Pat Its not that things you are uncertain of are false. Its that things that dont have sources are most likely to be false.
Consider 1) things that tend to gain momentum and travel as ideas are things that are exceptional and extrodinary in some way, shock value sells.. 2) things that are exceptional are the most likely to have attention and therefore if someone could validate it they likely would.
So a lack of sources to validate something usually suggests of all the people who heard the idea no one was ever able to prove it, and the more people try to prove something and fail the more likely it isnt true.