嵐橋在澳洲可能踢到鐵板:
"由中國嵐橋集團所持有的嵐橋集團澳洲子公司(Landbridge Group Australia),自2015年起取得達爾文港租用權長達99年後,持續成為澳洲的國安爭議焦點,澳洲輿論已多次傳出要求撤銷有關租用合約的呼聲。
澳洲人報指出,澳洲內閣國家安全委員會已日漸形成共識,支持撤銷嵐橋的達爾文港租用權,或者至少針對其港務管理工作實施多項管制措施。
另外報導提到,由於美國陸戰隊輪駐達爾文部隊必須使用達爾文港設施,因此對於中資企業持有達爾文港租用權的問題,已引起美國政府關注。"
雙方海軍的衝突讓之前的破冰嘗試顯得很徒勞:
"The Australian navy twice told the destroyer that it would send divers down and asked it to stay clear, Marles said on Saturday. Still, the Chinese ship moved closer after acknowledging the Australian request, and used a hull-mounted sonar that led the divers to exit from the water."
中方的反駁看就很虛張聲勢....
[ According to Marles, the incident occurred as Australian divers were attempting to remove fishing nets from the Toowoomba’s propellers. He said the Australian navy twice told the Chinese destroyer that it would send divers down and asked it to stay clear. The Chinese ship acknowledged the Australian request, moved closer, and used a hull-mounted sonar that caused minor injuries to the divers, Marles said.
Col. Wu, in his response on Monday, said Beijing is firmly opposed to the allegations and has lodged “solemn representations” with Australia. He said the Ningbo had been tracking and surveilling the Toowoomba in waters near the East China Sea, and did so in accordance with laws and regulations—which he didn’t specify. ]
各界都不認為在目前結盟戰對趨勢下的澳中關係能很快恢復如初:
[ 澳大利亚麦考瑞大学安全研究与犯罪学教授黄吕琛表示,“土乌巴舰” 穿越台海航行的消息被公布是向中国发出了一个不算隐晦的信号,那就是对于中共军队在声纳事件导致澳大利亚军人受伤的抗议,而对于台湾议题,澳大利亚还是会维持自己的立场。]
繼歸還文物之後,澳洲破冰暖心之舉第二回:
"Australia, in turn, recently announced that — after a lengthy security review — it would not cancel a Chinese company’s 99-year lease of the northern port of Darwin.
反過來澳洲也在最近宣布,經過長時間的安全審查後,將不會取消一家中國公司對澳洲北部的達爾文港長達99年租約。"
https://cn.nytimes.com/asia-pacific/20231106/china-xi-albanese-relations/zh-hant/dual/