世衛若沒提供科興疫苗的評估報告, 老韭們大概只能寄望中國藥廠生產的俄羅斯疫苗了~
"The Russian Direct Investment Fund, which has been in charge of international cooperation for Sputnik V, said in April it would produce 100 million doses in collaboration with Hualan Biological Bacterin Inc., in addition to an earlier deal announced in March for 60 million doses with Shenzhen Yuanxin Gene tech Co.
The two deals are in addition to a deal announced last November with Tibet Rhodiola Pharmaceutical Holding Co, which had paid $9 million to manufacture and sell the Sputnik V vaccine in China. RDIF said in April the terms of the deal were for 100 million doses with a subsidiary company belonging to Tibet Rhodiola."
"However, none of the three Chinese companies has begun manufacturing Sputnik V as of yet."
“That would be a loss for global health and an embarrassment for the Biden Administration. Americans should question whose interests are served by their colossal financial contributions to the WHO.”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/taiwan-and-the-who-11620685511?page=1
「這次G7會議首次公開提到台灣且是以支持方式行之,提到有關世界衛生組織以及世界衛生大會的參與,以及台海維和等部分。雖然G7成員國過去曾多次單獨發言支持台灣有意義參與世界衛生組織,以及成為世界衛生大會的觀察員(除了義大利以外),但具體成為七大工業國會議公報的一部分,意義更是不容小覷。
更值得注意的是,七大工業國公報將台海的和平與穩定,以及鼓勵以和平方式解決兩岸爭議包括其內,不僅顯示台海議題正式進入七大工業國的關注議程中,也代表台海維持現狀也不再是美國單方面承擔,七大工業國(甚至包括歐盟本身,因歐盟外長是會議參與者而不是受邀列席),也成為這個議題顯著的「利害相關者」。維持台海和平與穩定,要求以和平方式解決兩岸爭議的呼籲,已經多邊化,拖出傳統台海維和的美中台三角架構了。
值得注意的是,七大工業國外長會議公報有關台海和平與穩定的文字,就是四月十六日美日峰會聲明有關台灣部分的原封不動拷貝,這個發展不禁令人聯想,是否美日峰會與七大工業國外長會議後,類似對台海的關注還會在其他多邊,或是非台灣參與的雙邊場合出現,例如在美澳會談,甚至是北約峰會等場合出現。如果真的出現這樣的發展,除了顯示美國有意使台海議題多邊化外,也是讓中國知道其對台灣議題必須有所節制,因為現在這個議題已經不是美中的雙邊爭議,而是中國與全世界多個主要民主大國的集體矛盾了。」
“報導指出,G7國家領袖在公報當中表示:「我們將推廣我們的價值,方式包括呼籲中國尊重人權和基本自由,尤其關於新疆,以及依據中英聯合公報和基本法所訂定,香港應享有的這些權利、自由和高度自治。」
G7領袖還強調「台灣海峽兩岸和平和穩定的重要性,並鼓勵和平解決兩岸議題」。
公報並將寫道:「我們依舊嚴正關切東海和南海局勢,強烈反對任何單方面試圖改變現狀及令緊張情勢升溫。」”
一年後的G7立場不變:
「路透社報導,加拿大、法國、德國、義大利、日本、英國和美國的外交首長在聲明中呼籲和平解決台海兩岸問題,並表示G7集團成員在台灣問題上的基本立場沒有改變,包括一個中國政策。」
感謝法國馬失言再次確立G7保台立場:
"一名國務院高階官員透過電話告訴媒體記者:「G7成員國正傳達同一個訊息:我們希望在中國準備好合作的領域,與中國攜手合作」。
這名官員也強調:「我們當然會反對任何脅迫與市場操縱(行為),以及任何改變台海現狀的企圖。」
G7外長們希望在法國總統馬克宏(Emmanuel Macron)發表涉台爭議言論後,就對中國的擔憂發布口徑一致的訊息。"
從烏克蘭經驗看, 這種曖昧猶豫大概到維持到第二次太平洋戰爭尾聲前吧!
"The G-7 statement is expected to state a common approach and principles to address economic coercion, the people said, but would be separate from the traditional communiqué put out during these summits.
Members of the G-7 have long felt the sting of economic coercion when they have become crosswise with Beijing. "
https://www.wsj.com/articles/g-7-leaders-expected-to-take-aim-at-chinese-economic-coercion-92403567
今年G7令人有些意外的主題之一: 人工智慧
[ It is far from clear that this group of leaders — the G7 also includes Germany, Britain, France, Canada and Italy — can sustain a conversation on a technology that appeared to burst on the scene so quickly, even if it was years in the making. Past efforts to get the group to take up far more straightforward cybersecurity issues usually descended into platitudes about “public-private partnerships,” and there has never been serious discussion of rules to guide the use of offensive cyberweapons. ]
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/18/world/asia/g7-ukraine-artificial-intelligence.html
法理曙光:
"廣島峰會進一步將今年四月外長會議所主張的「和平確立的既有領土地位」(peacefully established status of territories)不容以武力或脅迫片面變更,納入了領袖聯合聲明中的一般性宣示(“[We] strongly oppos[e] any unilateral attempts to change the peacefully established status of territories by force or coercion anywhere in the world ...”)。這個「和平確立的既有領土地位」(peacefully established status of territories)是否成為跳脫聯合國憲章第二條第四款有關於「國際關係」(international relations)中禁止使用武力解決爭議,反對中國以武力解決台灣問題的國際法基礎,值得進一步觀察。"