Did you see this PR?
https://codeberg.org/grunfink/snac2/pulls/229
On top of that I'm also trying to hack a CGI+Crontab version of snac, but it's not ready yet.
examples/
directory with your description in the first comment on how to compile snac with musl (for other people to know how to do it without resourcing to the repository), and I'll merge it.On top of that I'm also trying to hack a CGI+Crontab version of snac, but it's not ready yet.
Nop, I'll add an example in the following days... :-)
As for the CGI+Crontab version, actually it's not that hard to hack something together with minimal changes to existing code and few new source files, but I'm facing a couple of issues that suggests a proper fork:
1. the CGI ends up being larger than 6Mb because of curl & openssl that, as far as I can tell, are not needed because all the CGI has to do is to save the proper queue item on the filesystem
2. no command handle the global queue alone
The second issue is quite easy to solve with minimal changes and could help everybody.
The first however requires a lot of careful reorganization of the code.
On the other hand, I don't like the idea of a fork diverging too much, first because you are doing a great work here so much I think #snac deserves much more visibility.
And yet, technically speaking, a fork would make much sense to keep both code bases clean and focused to their use case.
@Shamar @grunfink A cgi+crontab-version would be very interesting to have in some environments. Especially with a Fossil style script configuration https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/cgi.wiki