@Surasanji While, if you do feel it is possible you could be a risk, I agree it is responsible for you not to own a gun, I do not agree with the law.
While I am not particularly bothered when im living in the netherlands by the lack of a gun, and I do disagree with the law, that isnt what bothers me so much about your situation.
The idea of using normally private mental health to dictate who can own a gun is fundamentally disgusting to me. The reason is important. In a situation like that if there is a person who didnt agree and insisted ont he right to own a gun, but felt they were developing a mental disorder, they would explicitly avoid seeking mental health since by doing so they forfeit their rights in a society. This in turn would lead to more harm than good, not only is the sacred confidentiality of doctor and patient violated but it acts as a force in society that makes mental health issues spiral out of control and the situation worse. Plus, stigmatizing mental health...
@Surasanji I'm not suggesting they should have guns. But just because they shouldnt have guns doesnt mean we need to enforce it the way we do.
Think about how we handle it with anything else in most countries. For example if your physically no longer able to drive (such as you get epilepsy) a doctor could never legally directly get your license reported. It is simply illegal for you not to choose on your own to report yourself. If you dont and you hurt someone or have a seizure on the road you could be arrested for man slaughter.
I see you and your disease similarly. If you dont report yourself then you should be charged with negligence.
@freemo I can certainly understand your point of view.
I don't think people with conditions as serious as mine should have guns. I just don't think it's a smart policy to let people who's sickness might harm others given the chance have weapons that can give them the ability to do so.
But, I do totally understand your point of view and agree with parts of it.