@freemo
No, we did not.
Hmmm.... yet you immediately characterize certain studies as "not real science" without even looking at them, even going so far as to bring out a strawman for them.
The impression I got was that anything negative about vaccines is junk science. That vaccines are 100% benefit with 0% risk. I'm sure that's not how you actually feel, but that was the sense of what you wrote.
No, you didnt provide "real studies" you provided a power point presentation with pictures from what they claimed to be real studies with no links to any actual studies with which me, or anyone else could use to evaluate the facts.
Since you presented no "real studies" or anything of substance I relied on the thousands of studies i already read on the topic which came to a solid conclusion already.
Keep in mind this is no different than how I wouild treat a flat earther. If they had a real experiment or study to back up their claim I'd happily read it and almost certainly inevitably debunk it, or atleast learn something new and strange about physics. But should a flat earther fail to provide any such information I would otherwise result to my default, and well established, determination that the earth is round.
Also to be clear, since you seem to wish to misrepresent me when you dont agree with me...
I do **not** lump every study that shows risk as being absurd. Only the ones that are actually absurd (or in this case are a screen shot in a power point presentation with no legible link to a source).
There are a few real risk factors with vaccines, allergic reaction to those with egg allergies are a good one and presents a real risk factor that can even result in death.
Autism however has been shown with far more studies than were ever needed, to be unrelated to vaccines.