@realcaseyrollins

Ahh, without context on the OP I cant follow.. he is refering to replacing "nazi" with "negro" in some sort of message but I cant see the message he is referring to in order to evaluate it.

@namtari@toot.site

@freemo @namtari Yeah…he’s basically saying the Nazis’ excoriation from society is similar to the shunning of blacks in the olden days

I don’t believe they’re equivalent (being black is fine and nazism is reprehensible at best) but I do agree on the principle of discrimination that there are some similarities and Nazis should be allowed to speak their mind

@realcaseyrollins @freemo @namtari People who are said to be Nazis should be allowed to say what differentiates them from literal Nazis. The Nazi club should be burned in a fucking fire.

Depends on what we mean by "nazi" and "discrimination" here. If we are talking about a quite literal nazi-like person who wants to see the mass murder of someone based purely on race and seeing that race as fundementally inferior. Also if by discrimination we mean I dont need to like being around the guy and find his ideas a waste of my time and as such I dont invite him into my pesonal spaces, and dont read his messages to me or give a moment of my time to his argument after the initial interaction that let me determine his views were garbage.... well then by those two definitions I really have no problem discriminating against Nazis.

With all that said, do I think they should be protected from arrest by the government, assuming it is only an opinion and they never act on it nor try to incite others to act on it. Also should they be free to express that opinion in a **public** space, then yes, I think they should.

@maxmustermann
@realcaseyrollins @namtari@toot.site

@freemo @realcaseyrollins @namtari No matter how assburger you word, you gonna recommended.