Kyle Rittennhouse is...

PS I want to hear what you think, not what you think the jury will decide.

@freemo
Mega guilty. He shot his weapons. That's it.

He should not shoot his weapons. He did. He killed people, therefore he is guilty.

@pthenq1 Thats rather absurd reasoning considering the people he shot were literally trying to kill him (or at a minimum assault him)... he ran, tried to avoid the fight at every turn, and they chased him screamed they were going to kill him and even threw things at him as they chased him.

When you violently asssault or attempt to kill someone you loose the right to protection against being shot at, period.

One person even held a handgun up to his head at one point. But apparently because he shot someone who was about to shoot him, when he didnt initiate it, that makes him guilty.

Yea ok buddy, your logic needs a lot of work.

Follow

@pthenq1 to summarize your viewpoint: he didnt let a mob murder him who were literally saying they were going to murder him. Therefore he is guilty for doing the one thing that allowed him to survive being murdered.

oooookkkkkaaaayyyyyy......

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.