Seems pretty clear to me, want to place limits on it, get support for a new amendment.

@freemo There are limits, it's THE REST OF THE AMENDMENT.

Why was there an assault weapons ban then? It's okay for Congress to limit it and the President to agree to limit it.

Not hard to understand.

If what you're saying was true, you wouldn't need an amendment at all. It would be considered okay to do, like slavery was.

Follow

@jaysonmassey No nothing in tbe rest of tbe amendment imposes limits. Tbe rest of the amendment simply explains why jt is neccesary that gun rights not be infringed.

No its not ok for the president or congress to limit it short of writing and passing an amendment itself, which thry never dis.

Not sure why your saying it woukd be ok to limit if my saying was true or what it has to do with slavery, not following you on that part.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.