> I am arguing that extermination was not cool.
So you've been arguing a point that no one at any point remotely disagreed with and have explicitly agreed with.... Ok... cool
> It is not important if their ways were better, it is not cool they were extermitated.
Your right, if your only argument is that it was uncool that they were genocides then yea, at no point anyone argued with that. You made a separate argument about how great they were doing without money on their own (which wasnt true), but that being a falsehood was never used to claim genocide them was more acceptable as a result.
Still not sure why your arguing a thing that no one in their right mind has even hinted at disagreeing with.