@DataDrivenMD Why? Email is a federated service in a similar manner to ActivityPub and has widespread adoption. Why don't you think that parallel applies here?
@LouisIngenthron @DataDrivenMD Email is pretty much impossible to self-host if you want to be able to communicate with people on gmail, yahoo, outlook and a couple of more.
It's as if mastodon.social would demand a very strict adherence to the ActivityPub protocol as they implement it, and all other fediverse instances would have to comply or be labeled as untrustworthy and silenced/restricted.
(what happened to email is my prime argument for shunning facebook et al at)
@Mabande @DataDrivenMD That's just simply not true. I host my own email. Hosted cPanel servers are cheap and easy to maintain. I spend maybe an hour a year troubleshooting email issues. That's it. And I have no problem communicating with any of those big email systems.
My primary email address has been self-hosted for more than ten years now.
@Mabande Yes, I've experienced issues with smaller email providers getting emails blocked by major providers for no apparent reason, and @pluralistic wrote about the same thing here, I believe:
https://doctorow.medium.com/dead-letters-73924aa19f9d
So I would say that email is, at best, on life support as a truly federated service and is becoming closer to an oligopoly.
I will agree that the federated nature of ActivityPub means in principle there can be heterogeneous models for supporting servers, but I don't see much evidence of that in practice. I'd like to see donation-based instances, fee-based instances, and, yes, even "free" ad-supported instances (though I hope those remain the exception). However, I gather that discussion of these other types of models in the past has provoked talk of defederation.