MDPI 👇
---
RT @g_sbardella
MDPI journals have been included in the list of predatory journals. It was about time. https://predatoryreports.org/news/f/list-of-all-mdpi-predatory-publications?fbclid=IwAR2FbGSY4Dktl4X8GWkcfgAuBcBNZLk2uzmywGpv0CoJ8-2E9usR-3P8Glg
https://twitter.com/g_sbardella/status/1634456064916697092
@Pat “Predatory journals—also called fraudulent, deceptive, or pseudo-journals—are publications that claim to be legitimate scholarly journals, but misrepresent their publishing practices. Some common forms of predatory publishing practices include falsely claiming to provide peer review, hiding information about Article Processing Charges (APCs), misrepresenting members of the journal’s editorial board, and other violations of copyright or scholarly ethics.”
Thank you for explaining that. Yes, if any publication intentionally makes false statements, especially a scientific journal, that's a deal killer for sure.
Some of the other stuff, I'm not as concerned about -- using email to contact potential contributors is not a problem as far as I can see, as long as they are truthful and upfront about everything.
Also, I don't care if anyone violates a copyright of a scientific paper -- all research should be open to everyone for free.
@Pat ChatGPT summary :)