A line in a mostly unrelated post by a friend got me thinking about a maxim I've heard a lot lately: "#Sciencefiction is not about predicting the #future, but rather commenting on the present." It's become conventional wisdom rapidly approaching the status of a thought-terminating cliche.
When I sit down to write #SF, "what if" is my primary motivation. The here-and-now obviously shapes my thoughts, but I'm not *deliberately* writing about it—if I wanted to do that, I'd pick a different genre.
Maybe I'm not exactly trying to predict the future, but I am trying to make believable predictions about what *could* happen if such-and-such occurred. And I think most of the SF authors whose work I admire would agree with me, unless I'm just really bad at getting the point!
@falcennial Yeah, to me the starting is a lot more interesting than the commenting, most of the time. I don't object to commentary when it's done well. But I do object to the idea that it's what all or even most SF is about.