https://newsbots.eu/@BBCNews/105342775637721377
I'm never been a fan of "save internet for childs" nor "make internet family friendly".
I personally think that children are shouldn't be allowed to access internet. Why ?
- Because they're dumb (lacks the necessary experience that's why we also decided to not giving them permission to have sex.)
- They easily get manipulated (either by stranger or a corp. Just look up how much kids using their parents credit card without their parents knowing just to buy an in-game item which they think it will make them looks cool etc.)
By making internet accessible for them (without giving a somekind of restriction like firewall, etc).
You risk your childs being exposed to unnecessary information that would affect their mental growth.
Let's make internet better for everyone by start banning childs from using the internet. 
🇳🇱
@ravenclaw I agree with half of this, that the internet doesnt need to be child friendly.. but not because I dont think kids should use it, but more so because I feel we shield kids from more than we have a right to, or at least more than is healthy. Let them have access to adult content, just raise them to be mature about it
This is Mur 
@freemo @ravenclaw
I also share the same feeling. Hiding is the problem not the content itself. This becomes clearly visible in a very conservative society like here.
@ravenclaw
The thing is world is not a sugar land filled only with good.
The bad part of the internet just windows the bad part of the world.
@mur2501
> The thing is...
> ...with the good
Agreed. But just because this world isn't a sugar land doesn't mean we just accept it. If we do, we will think of murder as "meh. We're not living in heaven aren't we. It's normal".
Then how are we supposed to help anybody in this case ? (Ignore this. Since this only leads us to be out of topics if discussed even further. But do keep this as a reference of why i take the authoritative/preventive aproach.)
> the bad part...
> ...of the world
Yes! That's why we should block them. 
@mur2501
> i also share...
> ... itself.
implying if internet and what it's promoting on the frontpages itself isn't a part of the problem.