@namark if anyone's making the bottles it'd be, like, supermicro
@sir snake oil is nothing sold as something. It takes no effort to make it, it only takes effort to sell it. Are you saying everyone working at google is a salesperson?
@namark now you're over-extending the analogy. You're suggesting that what Googlers are making is "nothing". What the real comparison with snake oil is not selling "nothing" as "something", but selling something harmful under the guise of being beneficial.
@sir I simply meant to express my opinion, so I'm not sure why are you arguing the meaning of an analogy that isn't even yours in this context. Nevertheless a quick search reveals, that snake oil originally indeed was an actual snake oil, made out of snake. Ineffective but not harmful, so nothing. The ability to sell this nothing as something, is what allows you to then replace the nothing with another cheaper nothing that might also be harmful. It being harmful does not matter and is not a necessity for such industry. It being nothing is. The cheapest nothing just so happens to be harmful. Nobody advertises snake oil as "this will cure all your diseases by killing you".
You think your average web developer is concerned about chrome becoming the standard? You think they cry and moan while (apparently literally everyone at) google is force feeding them? No, they rejoice that they no longer need to support another stupid browser. The so called web platform was doomed since its inception. It was just an attempt to escape the tyranny of proprietary OS, which is why it eventually turned into an OS itself, but you can't fix a foundation by building the right type of balcony. The web would have stayed simple and narrow scope, if the native OS platforms adopted the free software culture.
@namark in this analogy google employees are making the oil, not the bottles. Which I feel is pretty obvious