While I avoid words like "realistic" (it shifts discourse to arbitrary delineations of "realistic"), I don't think "extremely photorealistic" is a thing in that context. It's non-existent or extremely rare (unlikely). I guess unless it's SFW.

Someone is either up to some crime or not.

If it was a real thing, I might have something to say, however, I don't really like to engage with hypotheticals. I don't really like abstract discussions with little to no real world value.

Follow

It's not even a new hypothetical. It's a hypothetical from the *90s*.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.