@freemo the point about guns is unclear for two reasons. First is not a phrasing that will mean things to people unfamiliar with the US. Secondly, I can't tell whether you want to say "whatever the constitution of the country says goes", "everyone should have a right to carry guns they could use at ~all times unless sentenced to a loss of that right", something in-between, or something significantly different.
@freemo and presumably on carrying them? (For example in CH access to guns is pretty open, albeit in most cases carries a registration requirement, but carrying them other than to move them between places is mostly illegal.)
Many European people will find what you are saying confusing or misunderstand it. I'd rather phrase it as "unrestricted access and unrestricted carry".
@robryk I mean to say there should be no laws which infringe on access to guns. In other words there should be a path to ownership for **all** guns, and that should not give preferential treatment to any class of person (which also means not putting up financial barriers).