P1: My preference of post-processing, based on the DNG file
P2: My phone's preference of post-processing, aka the JPG file. It got the JPG file first, then got the DNG file. I assume this JPG file is what you get when you use the stock camera app.
P3: The unprocessed DNG file displayed by the default app to view photos in Windows 10.
----
In terms of "my preference", I don't mean my style. I don't know photography very well, so I just messing around with the slider and see if I like it. So each photo I produce, it got a different style😂 I'm just starting learning it, don't be too mean on me.
I fully appreciate that those who use Photoshop etc look at free software such as GIMP and say that it is no where near as good. What can the community do to build tools that can serve their needs and help transition away from big tech solutions, where big tech calls the shots all the time.?
Yeah, with @libreoffice they have the document foundation behind the project and backing from others supporting the open standards.
@zleap @skyblond ...and a commercial ecosystem providing development, custom features/fixes and long-term support: https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-in-business/
@zleap Yeah, free software are great to have, but without a strong commercial support and fairly good management, it's really hard to support serious usages. You can't hope for some editors to know how to properly submit a GitHub issue. I emotionally support those software, I use GIMP some times, but I do prefer some paid software that I can yell at them when something goes wrong because I paid for that. And by "yell at them", I don't mean physically, I can report the problem, let them figure it out, and I can actively keep asking them when I can get the fix. With free and opensource software, nobody should bear this burden, and thus the user can't expect a proper "growth" for the software.