Court arguments can be hilariously entertaining (because judges are very good at cutting through bullshit) and frustrating (because it's supposed to be pure eristics from both counsels and because many problems are caused by lack of precision in the law) at the same time. I just got entertained by a discussion about differences between kinds of delivery and about excluded middle: youtu.be/cuWVWUaNdqc?t=1486

Follow

@robryk you just taught me a new word: "eristics"

I had a course in constitutional law that talked us through some of the arguments testing the U.S. constitution: it was a real eye-opener, showed me more directly than I had before how the "rubber meets the road" when it comes to law

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.