Amikke @Amikke@qoto.org

Thread from mateosfo on Twitter.

The stupid discourse over the price of gasoline is the quickest way to conclude that everything is galactically broken. Here’s a quick primer.

Consumers think they’re being creamed by the “price” of gasoline, but they’re not. They’re being creamed by the “cost” of transport.🧵

For most of the past 30 years, the car industry has been transitioning its products from cars that got increasingly good fuel economy, to trucks and SUVs that are essentially stuck around 25 miles per gallon.

No, this is not just a “USA” thing. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/share-of-suvs-in-total-car-sales-in-key-markets-2010-2019

As usual, car industry has mostly been lying and bullying its way to converting fleet from more-efficient models, to gas-guzzling SUVs.

VW got caught; US automakers cheated the old fashioned way, and just rigged the process.

Yes, this was predicted. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/cafe-loophole-could-lead-to-bigger-cars/2011/12/14/gIQA3bGLuO_blog.html

So, now that the car industry has driven gasoline demand through the roof, and a (completely predictable) price shock has hit the oil industry, car consumers are angry about …

The cars they bought. Which are mostly trucks and SUVs. https://www.forbes.com/wheels/news/light-trucks-now-outselling-cars/

Except … they don’t know the problem is the car they bought. They think the problem is price of gasoline.

Math quiz: A cat buys a Civic that gets 55 miles per gallon. A dog buys a F150 gets 27 miles per gallon. Both drive 20 miles each day.

Who has higher transport costs?

The dog will complain about the price of gasoline. The cat will wonder what the dog is going on about.

Oh, and of course, the folks who chose other modes – transit, bikes, walking – gas prices mean nothing to them.

But in the USA, we do two things:

First, we mandate driving. Yes, it’s a mandate: The government throws a couple trillion dollars per year at driving subsidies, and backs up the subsidies with land use patterns that prohibit people from moving around without a car.

And second, we let the car industry govern us.

Directly, the car industry sets fuel economy standards, controls how our tax dollars are spent, and controls land use with highway and road funding policies. Indirectly, the car industry is the reason our military is so well-equipped – oil wars are expensive!!

Even worse, the car industry has proven that it can convince Americans to tolerate a massive amount of death and destruction caused by their products. Nothing causes more death and destruction in the USA than the car industry – nope, not even guns.

All of this is to say …

The political salience of “high gasoline prices” is really a thin veneer for how everything in the USA is about cars. We wouldn’t even need to “ban cars” to solve it! Just banning gasoline cars, or even forcing real fuel economy standards, would make a huge difference.

Of course, the real solutions do, in fact, involve reducing car use dramatically, reforming land use in our cities, ending parking mandates, pumping a few trillion into transit and bike lanes … that’s the only viable pathway. It’s not optional.

So, either we defeat the car industry, which has no problem handing the government over to Republican fascists if it allows their SUV sales kick to continue, or …

They defeat us. I sure hope they lose! Go, us!

fediblock mastodon.social for racism

Zdecydowanie mój ulubiony rodzaj pociągu to "opóźniony przyspieszony pociąg osobowy"

If Go had monads would they be called Gonads

Warning: There’s an app for blurring out sensitive information in images called Obfuscate being featured on #GNOME Software right now.

Please be careful.

The default blur setting can easily be reversed.

The default should be to replace the areas with a solid colour or a pattern not derived from the underlying information.

This really should not be a featured app in its current state.

#security #linux #apps #obfuscate

When redacting images, always make sure to fully replace the part you're redacting instead of shading it, as small differences might remain which could allow someone to reveal the text.

#feditips #fedifacts

@TeaTootler @mushroom_soup Just be sure your matchmaker can spell.

“Why did you leave?”
“No ping pong table”

>why did this happen?

bullied.

>what could posses someone to go out and do this?

bullied.

>what would have to happen for someone to think this is a good idea?

bullied.

solve your bully problems and the victims will stop solving them for you lmao