@lovelylovely
If any of LA Times' writers are younger than 70 years old, no wonder they find it a mystery. They likely flipped off Boomers instead of paying attention.

@ClaraListensprechen4 @lovelylovely
Lord knows it was not good for a whole lot of marginalized people. But there still was a middle class for us straight privileged whites. We bought a house in 1973. Paid for it on my salary as my wife has never worked ouside the home since i graduated from college in 1970 with no student loan debt.

@lovelylovely @dbc3
Of course, but in terms of buying a middle class house, I'm sorry to report that "red-lining" remains alive and well today and in some areas on stearoids.

@ClaraListensprechen4 @dbc3 Absolutely, My parents bought there home in 1967 in the city of Gardena California until 2012.

@lovelylovely

People also bought much smaller and cheaper homes for a period there. The whole "pre-built" home craze was around that time and they didnt quite last sadly.

@ClaraListensprechen4 @dbc3

@lovelylovely

They were called prefab homes. Fully made at a factory and just moved in place and plopped down. Very cheap, popular from the early 1960s onward, and fell apart very easily.

builtprefab.com/wp-content/upl

@ClaraListensprechen4 @dbc3

@freemo @lovelylovely @ClaraListensprechen4

I had an assignment as a young engineer to test transporting them on railcars. Told them it would not work but the company had a friend in high places in my company.. Built a frame with outriggers to put on container cars. Loaded up one of their modules - a 10 by 40 ft quarter of a house-to-be. Did our standard impact test - let the car roll down a grade and hit a parked car loaded with gravel and brakes locked. Result? see next:

@freemo @lovelylovely @ClaraListensprechen4
Staircase broke free, sailed from one end to the other, taking out everything in its path.

@ClaraListensprechen4 @freemo @lovelylovely All we had was a view of the aftermath when we opened it up and went inside. I had to keep myself from laughing since the factory rep was so disappointed.

@dbc3

It seems like a rather exagerated test to be honest... I mean few things would survive that yet would be perfectly fine on an otherwise normal railway trip..

Im guessing it was more a safety test or something?

@ClaraListensprechen4 @lovelylovely

@freemo @ClaraListensprechen4 @lovelylovely

Freight trains don't handle like passenger trains. Cars go through hump yards where they are rolled down a hill and switched into the track for the train they will go out on. Special cases are cars like the one I worked on for the Space Shuttle solid rocket boosters. They are stenciled :"do not hump" and get special (expensive) handling. These people wanted to go in general service for cheapest rates,

@freemo @ClaraListensprechen4 @lovelylovely

"few things would survive that"
loads of coal, wallboard, automobiles, stone, sand, grain, crates secured in boxcars all survive it. Hauling those things on a freight railroad was impractical then. Now there are plenty of unit trains of all container cars which go point-to-point, Could possibly be accommodated.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.