Why I don't like #Linux:
Oh, you want to host HTTPS? Install a self-signed certificate into Apache with certbot and Let's Encrypt. (That mumbo jumbo is the easy part, and is the same as Windows. But here's where it takes a turn...)
Oh, you want to install certbot? First, install snapd, a whole other framework for installing dependencies because apparently the one built into the OS isn't good enough.
Oh, snapd is mysteriously failing? Get to google, son.
Oh, Google has enshittified and there are no relevant results? Ahahaha 💩
So, anyway, apparently the answer was that at one obscure point in the process, I was supposed to type the word "socket" where every other service I've ever installed needed the word "service" and I didn't notice the difference. That's two hours of my life I'm never getting back.
🇳🇱
@LouisIngenthron Except none of that is really needed .. you are talking about a specific way of installing something on a specific distro.. its outdated and not really how most system admins would do it.
For example all my servers run linux. You just use one of the many cool tools like traefik, never touch snap (in most cases youd probably use docker so you dont touch ANY dependencies), you dont even need to do the certs yourself they are obtained all automatically... A full infrastructure is up with a single command.
Even if we talk about the old bare metal way on ubuntu... windows doesnt even have a dependency management system at all like snap or apt. So its hard to see how it is better to have to manually go out and fetch one dependency after another, hope it all works, and deal with convoluted point and clicking GUI to find your way. At least in linux all your dependencies are pulled in in a single go.
@freemo The server was provided by a client, running CentOS 7. All I have is SSH access. So, I had to configure by hand, and snapd is the recommended way to do so by the certbot team for that distro.
Also, fwiw, on Windows, I just downloaded ACME program and ran it. It didn't need any dependencies.
@LouisIngenthron even if the servert was provided by a friend why not just install docker and then bring it all up in a single command? with no dependencies at all.
Personally im not sure why anyone would operate a server outside of a docker-type environment.
@freemo It's a dedicated server, not cloud.
@freemo Containerized microservices are very useful tools, but that feels like square-peg/round-hole. Not everything needs to be a microservice.
@LouisIngenthron Im not talking about microservices at all.. monolithic services run just fine (and better) in containers too. These days its the norm for all services, micro or otherwise.
@freemo I'm not a sysadmin, so this isn't my area of expertise, but that seems like overkill to create a whole new linux subsystem in a container when I already have a perfectly good one outside of the container.
@LouisIngenthron containers are light weight and still reside on your own kernel, at least on linux. On windows they can be quite inefficient since there is no native kernel, but thats another matter. On linux they arent anymore resource intensive than an isolated chroot directly.
Id say bare metal is overkill because now you have a system you need to perpetually maintain and keep upt o date and constantly battle with dependency rot, something docker addresses quite nicely.
@LouisIngenthron Im not sure what you mean... you jsut install docker on the dedicated server, then run your services in docker... the cloud is just a bunch of dedicated servers.