@nanook i pulled one version that said 10k too, when i was last looking at the numbers. there's been argument from people screen capping this page that there is a 6k, 9k and 12k version going around.

@freemo @Pat @sergeantcat
@nanook no the goal post move is to say that vaers doesn't "count" because reasons. just like the heart and platelet issues didn't count because it's basically impossible to get vaxxers to accept anything as a reaction. i'm not sure how they even got myocardia on that list.

@Pat @freemo @sergeantcat

@icedquinn

Of course VARES counts. What you cant do is just say "hey look I added a all the numbers in this column and got this big number"... THAT is meaningless. If you want to infer things from VARES you need a based understanding of statistics to know how to pick out meaningful patterns. It isnt as simple as adding.

@nanook @sergeantcat @Pat

@freemo @nanook @sergeantcat @Pat

> vaccines are safe
> look at this database we made to prove how little incidents there are
> look at this yearly average
> now stop looking at the database because one of the columns has just exploded and its solely due to one newly approved thing
> quinn you just don't understand statistics

:blobcatglare:
@icedquinn @freemo @Pat @nanook @sergeantcat
>multiply VAERS numbers by approximately 100 because less than 1% of cases get reported
@meowski no; i have seen the discussions about underreporting but i don't want to deal with trying to argue whether a fuzz factor exists or not.

it's easier to just point that it's anomalous as it stands.

@Pat @freemo @nanook @sergeantcat
Follow

@icedquinn

What precautions do you take to protect yourself and others from COVID-19?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.