@yogthos@mastodon.social
For a no profit organization it's pretty wealthy thanks to its commercial patners: from #Google to #CloudFlare, I don't think we can qualify #Mozilla products as #free.
One could say that there is no link between #freedom pursuit and #wealth, and according to liberals and their #propaganda / #marketing / theoretical framework there isn't any.
But statistically, groups that collect wealth just pretend to fight for freedom.
After all wealth is a form of #power and power restricts others' freedom.
So ultimately rich philantrophism is just a marketing investment. Or a form of corruption. Or, most of times, both.
#Mozilla's wealth come from #US companies that work in the opposite direction of what they pretend to do. So they align with their interests.
We shouldn't forget what #OpenSource is: a marketing tool.
They want to be confused with the #FreeSoftware built from the #hackers they marginalize, but they have nothing to do with us.
@yogthos@mastodon.social
@Shamar @yogthos
But statistically, groups that collect wealth just pretend to fight for freedom.
I dunno what this statistics is, but history teaches us that groups that collected enough wealth do value their freedom, and are perfectly ready to fight for it. If necessary, literally fight — with weapons. These fights are now known as bourgeois revolutions.
And I do not see, why freedom of computing should be an exception. Does Google willingly use nonfree software? I never heard of any example and I bet — no: they do value a freedom to make their computing however they wish, without asking anyone’s assent. But even Google is not almighty: we know, they failed to eliminate Intel ME (a malware built into all modern Intel CPUs), but note — they tried.
They do not bother about our freedom, of course.