Show newer
Shamar boosted
Shamar boosted
Gli #hacker non sono criminali informatici, come ben spiega @smaurizi@mastodon.social qui. La stampa "generalista" usa spesso il termine in modo inappropriato, forse anche per dare un'aura criminale a chi pretende di capire che succede "dietro" lo schermo del suo computer, e, soprattutto, chi lo fa succedere.

@anzu

L'istanza qoto.org

L'amministratore è un liberista libertario e ogni tanto va down per diversi giorni per manutenzione aggiornamento.

@anzu

Qoto ne offre 2¹⁶-1

ha altri difetti però.

Shamar boosted

@aral

Have you seen 's definition?

It has been carefully crafted around the needs of OSI's sponsors, , , .. that fear the requirements of the , but are more than happy to open wash their systems, as long as they don't need to share their most valuable asset: training data.

lwn.net/SubscriberLink/995159/

@aral

Have you seen 's definition?

It has been carefully crafted around the needs of OSI's sponsors, , , .. that fear the requirements of the , but are more than happy to open wash their systems, as long as they don't need to share their most valuable asset: training data.

lwn.net/SubscriberLink/995159/

Shamar boosted
Shamar boosted

This makes me want to scream and pull out my hair.

"Reduce your vocabulary by 10-20% to prove you're a human."

@quinta

Attenzione, se parliamo sul serio di sicurezza, parlare di threat model senza sottolineare anche le vulnerabilità evidenti è poco utile.

E di vulnerabilità evidenti qui ce ne sono due:

- Google come single point of failure
- incapaci al Governo

Concentrarsi solo sul secondo è davvero miope: se l'infrastruttura del Paese fosse distribuita, invece che sotto il controllo esclusivo di una singola azienda o due, la seconda vulnerabilità non potrebbe essere sfruttata tanto facilmente.

Shamar boosted

How is it #Python is moving away from well-known, verifyable OpenPGP signatures (kinda like federation) to something with a centralised single point of failure that barely checks anything and trusts random commercial services‽

This is worse than ridiculous. Have fun…

Sometimes I wonder whether to still bother with FOSS. I see a wedge being driven into the midst of the conglomerate of communities.

I read something the other day (ofc cannot find it now) where someone was wondering why IT is constantly dumbing down its tools, whereas all other fields require people to actually learn how to safely use a tool first. This also applies.

@mirabilos

Unfortunately we cannot simply forget them, at least in Europe.

They are opening a huge loophole in the , I suppose to better serve their sponsors.
Open washing will cause harm to people and democracies!

discuss.opensource.org/t/list-

@mirabilos

Unfortunately we cannot simply forget them, at least in Europe.

They are opening a huge loophole in the , I suppose to better serve their sponsors.
Open washing will cause harm to people and democracies!

discuss.opensource.org/t/list-

Wow!

It's impressive how "open" is @OpenSource!

I've been silenced on forum for ten days after posting discuss.opensource.org/t/priva.

Now I'm back... and guess what?

I'm too dangerous to .

🤷‍♂️

Shamar boosted

1) "#EU #AI Act" wird erlassen
2) #EUAIAct enthält Ausnahmeregelungen für " free
and open source" modelle

So weit, so gut.

Dann aber, Teil 3:

Die OSI (ja, DIE von opensource.org) wollen das Open Source AI Label (auch) für Systeme vergeben, deren Trainingsdaten nicht zugänglich sind. 🤯

discuss.opensource.org/t/list-

#OpenSource #EU

Shamar boosted

Schaut für mich wirklich so aus, also ob #Meta (#Facebook) bereits festgelegt hat, dass sie "Open Source AI" machen (youtu.be/Xu8VihPQcgE) und die OSI sich nun (zu) stark verbiegt, um deren Vorgehensweise (Trainingsdaten nicht zu veröffentlichen) als "Open Source AI" zu adeln: opensource.org/blog/how-we-pas

💩

#OpenSourceAI #OpenSource

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.