Show newer

@quinta

Attenzione, se parliamo sul serio di sicurezza, parlare di threat model senza sottolineare anche le vulnerabilità evidenti è poco utile.

E di vulnerabilità evidenti qui ce ne sono due:

- Google come single point of failure
- incapaci al Governo

Concentrarsi solo sul secondo è davvero miope: se l'infrastruttura del Paese fosse distribuita, invece che sotto il controllo esclusivo di una singola azienda o due, la seconda vulnerabilità non potrebbe essere sfruttata tanto facilmente.

Shamar boosted

How is it #Python is moving away from well-known, verifyable OpenPGP signatures (kinda like federation) to something with a centralised single point of failure that barely checks anything and trusts random commercial services‽

This is worse than ridiculous. Have fun…

Sometimes I wonder whether to still bother with FOSS. I see a wedge being driven into the midst of the conglomerate of communities.

I read something the other day (ofc cannot find it now) where someone was wondering why IT is constantly dumbing down its tools, whereas all other fields require people to actually learn how to safely use a tool first. This also applies.

@mirabilos

Unfortunately we cannot simply forget them, at least in Europe.

They are opening a huge loophole in the , I suppose to better serve their sponsors.
Open washing will cause harm to people and democracies!

discuss.opensource.org/t/list-

@mirabilos

Unfortunately we cannot simply forget them, at least in Europe.

They are opening a huge loophole in the , I suppose to better serve their sponsors.
Open washing will cause harm to people and democracies!

discuss.opensource.org/t/list-

Wow!

It's impressive how "open" is @OpenSource!

I've been silenced on forum for ten days after posting discuss.opensource.org/t/priva.

Now I'm back... and guess what?

I'm too dangerous to .

🤷‍♂️

Shamar boosted

1) "#EU #AI Act" wird erlassen
2) #EUAIAct enthält Ausnahmeregelungen für " free
and open source" modelle

So weit, so gut.

Dann aber, Teil 3:

Die OSI (ja, DIE von opensource.org) wollen das Open Source AI Label (auch) für Systeme vergeben, deren Trainingsdaten nicht zugänglich sind. 🤯

discuss.opensource.org/t/list-

#OpenSource #EU

Shamar boosted

Schaut für mich wirklich so aus, also ob #Meta (#Facebook) bereits festgelegt hat, dass sie "Open Source AI" machen (youtu.be/Xu8VihPQcgE) und die OSI sich nun (zu) stark verbiegt, um deren Vorgehensweise (Trainingsdaten nicht zu veröffentlichen) als "Open Source AI" zu adeln: opensource.org/blog/how-we-pas

💩

#OpenSourceAI #OpenSource

@Debby @remixtures

In theory, I'd fully agree.

But is rushing to open wash any black box with [a new "Open Source AI" that nobody want (except BigTech)](samjohnston.org/2024/10/15/the).

@Debby @remixtures

In theory, I'd fully agree.

But is rushing to open wash any black box with [a new "Open Source AI" that nobody want (except BigTech)](samjohnston.org/2024/10/15/the).

Shamar boosted

Omini di burro.

btfp.sp.unipi.it/it/2024/10/om

Come l'omino di burro del romanzo di Collodi, chi introduca nelle scuole e nelle università strumenti di "intelligenza artificiale generativa", promette agli studenti un Paese dei Balocchi in cui potranno scrivere senza aver pensato.

Un pensiero critico sull'uso e l'introduzione dell'AI generativa a #scuola @scuola @nilocram @iamarf

Shamar boosted

State-affiliated Chinese hackers penetrated AT&T, Verizon, Lumen and others; they entered their networks and spent months intercepting US traffic - from individuals, firms, government officials, etc - and they did it all without having to exploit any code vulnerabilities. Instead, they used the back door that the FBI requires every carrier to furnish:

wsj.com/tech/cybersecurity/u-s

1/

Shamar boosted
Shamar boosted

Turns out @tarakiyee was right on Open Source AI in "Is the Open Source Bubble about to Burst?" tarakiyee.com/is-the-open-sour

The #OSAID's weasel wording creates loopholes big enough to drive a truck through sideways: discuss.opensource.org/t/malic

Shamar boosted

Anche di questo articolo #Facebook non permette la pubblicazione. Perché critica #Draghi o perché dice che la Cina investe nella ricerca? roars.it/la-cina-leuropa-e-dra

I really think that every marginalized group that suffered and systemic oppression should join the discussion about

If a black box will be distributed, regulated and trusted as , no human right organization will be able to inspect the dataset used to train it.

And if you can implant undetectable backdoors in a machine learning model (see arxiv.org/abs/2204.06974), you can much more easily implant undetectable bias that will hurt some groups of people to benefit others.

people and victims of systemic should really demand transparency,...before it's too late!

Show thread
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.