@376668346

1.你说得有道理，这几个人的主页我都看了，他们的确是在宣传种族主义和纳粹主义，管理员甚至自豪地自称自己是种族主义者和纳粹主义者，不过这些人用的是二次元头像，时间线上多是二次元图片和牢骚，还有一些种族主义的侮辱词汇，例如nigger，我搜索racist的结果有30多个，大都支持种族歧视，但是Nazist和Nazism 的结果只有一个，这些人有的在头像旁边加上了纳粹符号，有的转一些歌颂纳粹主义的表情包，有的发一些期待纳粹征服世界之类的话，我认为的确可以说这个实例是一个宣扬种族主义和纳粹的实例，但其用户对纳粹主义停留在表面的符号宗拜(不排除我了解的不够多的情况)，我认为这类的纳粹主义者还是应该和另一类纳粹主义者相区分，即组织严密，思想同质的纳粹主义的，但宽泛而言，可以说这是一个种族主义和纳粹主义实例。

2.我认为屏蔽是正确的做法，如果这些的确在进行违法活动，公权力介入也是应该的，当然了，我们并不生活在同一个国家，也管不了别国的事，我们自己的问题更多，更复杂。

3.The technical details are perhaps less important than the practical effect: no one has authority over these platforms: no one owns them. While governments and users can place pressure on the big social media companies to ban problematic users or communities, for better or worse, no one can stop anyone creating their own servers or peer-to-peer networks.

These technologies, then, are effectively uncensorable. According to a report by Emmi Bevensee, the co-founder of research consultancy Rebellious Data and the social media monitoring tool SMAT, extremists have been advocating, and even developing them, for years.

" The reason I want it as a trans anti-fascist is the same reason that a Nazi wants it; we just have opposite ends "

“Every marginalized community knows what it’s like to be systematically deplatformed”, says Bevensee, who uses non-binary pronouns, pointing to the way in which groups such as sex workers have adopted platforms like Mastodon after finding themselves unable to advertise their services.

But as Bevensee’s report shows, peer-to-peer platforms are a double-edged sword. “The reason I want it as a trans anti-fascist is the same reason that a Nazi wants it; we just have opposite ends,” they explain.

“You know who really doesn’t understand it? The FBI,” Bevensee adds: “we’re talking about a technology that can’t be subpoenaed. It can’t be surveiled” and, in order to carry out remote surveillance of private chats, “you would have to back door every single device in the world”.

This opens the way for extremists to propagandize and organize on platforms that are beyond the reach of legal authorities and tech giants alike. After the far right-friendly social media site Gab encountered hosting problems and app store bans, it rebuilt itself on Mastodon’s software, despite determined opposition from the platform’s creators and users.

文章提到，假如用户使用的是去中心化平台，这些平台就不会因为外部的施压而封杀"问题用户"。 (去中心化保护问题用户)

文章还提到，"极端主义者"长年以来一直在推行在研发这类技术。(研发去中心化和p2p等技术的是坏人)

文章还提到，因为这些技术无法被监控，无法被传唤，极端主义者就可以利用这些技术进行宣传和组织。(使用这些技术的是坏人)

我看到了Double edged sword，但总体而言这篇文章对于去中心化等技术表示的是敌意。

@Vectorfield @376668346 the correct way to address nazi problem is to defer to law. It makes no sense to take down platform. Why not ban English since neonazis speak English? Why not ban telephone because neonazis use smart phones? I stopped using Facebook because everyone on my facebook is successful and beautiful 35 yr old F500 director with 2-3 kids and sporting 6 pack, and all of a sudden I am a facist because I am using a platform that doesn’t stress that I need to buy Botox 😓😓😓