NOS 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U @admitsWrongIfProven@qoto.org

@the_etrain I think this might be a sub principle to "food goes in the noisy hole"

@the_etrain Oh, so they have figured out how to use the burger bun math @Alice tooted about for floating?
Then just add enough carbs to stop them, it's the fiber content that makes them float.

@daswarkeinhuhn Und Regenbogen?

@wortspielfettgesicht Wegbeschreibung zum Popo? Handelt es sich etwa um Zäpfchen?

@geist "Haben Sie denn überhaupt genug Geld, um das so zu formulieren? Nicht vergessen: nur ihre Meinung ist frei, nicht die Formulierung, die kost extra."

@OhMyGod
Komme leider bei deinen letzten beiden Tröts nicht mehr 100% mit, was du im Detail meinst.

Dass unser Geld da verschwendet wird in schikanierenden Prozessen, nicht effizient eingesetzt, habe ich den Teil richtig verstanden?

Dass BA-Mitarbeitys schlecht behandelt werden, gerade wenn sie helfen wollen, das hatte ich auch schon gehört.

@Plasmogen5_2

@Plasmogen5_2@dju.social
> Wofür

Die gute alte Ablenkung, tjaja. Wenn sich die armen streiten...

@OhMyGod@infosec.exchange

@interfluidity Isn't that they fit so well into it why they are not beloved?

@daswarkeinhuhn Was sind denn Drukos?

@vriska I usually just announce those noodles being in the pot represent humanitys hope for survival and watch as people come from everywhere to remove them.

@renardboy Time to responsibly dispose of the garden centers!

@renardboy Oh wait. Is the stuff legal to use in CA? I mean if not, the risk of resale would be minimal?

@renardboy Ah, that makes sense. Would have to break the seal and say it's probably tainted and not even that is really a guarantee.

@Alice That's some interesting math there. Subtract the fiber to get the total mass... has anyone tried to use that for levitation?

@the_etrain He escaped Elba again. Hide the Bourbons.

@light The two cases differ a lot. In the first, a near-monopoly development of not selling but renting software was exploited to hurt people (as far as i know, actually illegal content to be treated seperately). The second does not include anything harmful, only a not technologically sound proposal, which is excusable from people not involved in tech and not getting support (like for example politicians would get on state dime).

@daswarkeinhuhn *kratzt alles ist normal-Lack ab*

Hier, bitte sehr. Alles noch da.

@light >What is written there implies a woman was treated as an object.
How so?

Well as you noticed, it is very short. The woman is subject to abortion laws, but nothing women could do would have any influence. That's object, not subject.

@catsalad Correct, it is not I as in me, it is U as in you, others. It's an AU.