I posted a trascript of my conversation with ChatGPT, the best conversation anyone will ever have with an AI. https://smaldino.com/wp/how-many-potatoes-could-fit-in-a-pair-of-pants/
WE DID IT! The Texas Observer will remain open!
Our board just voted to rescind both the layoffs and the closure. We'll have more news soon, but we believe this is the start of a very positive transformation at our publication—and you were a huge part of it. THANK YOU! You proved to the world that #TexasNeedsAnObserver!
https://www.texasobserver.org/texas-observer-no-layoffs-remains-open-board-vote/
A mostly well-thought-out letter from https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/ requesting a slow-down in #AI #LLM #chatgpt experimentation
But I do have one quibble with this part: "AI research and development should be refocused on making today's powerful, state-of-the-art systems more accurate, safe, interpretable, transparent, robust, aligned, trustworthy, and loyal."
"Loyal" 🤔 Are they serious? Loyal to whom or what? Who is going to do the loyalty testing?
I love how Barnes & Noble specifically promoted some of these "banned" books. Every library and bookstore should do this.
Now that ChatGPT had made solutions cheap, and disincentivized problem solving and creativity, how will we cultivate original thought?
Asimov dramatized the question in his novella Profession
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.
~ Isaac Asimov
Elon Musk seems relentlessly, comically hellbent to prove my point on the Myth of the Secret Genius. https://brianklaas.substack.com/p/the-myth-of-the-secret-genius
My colleague and coauthor Jevin West has been warning me for years about the mess that we would face as #GPT and other text-based generative AI matured.
I was not sufficiently concerned.
I just realized why.
I thought of them as tools for deception, and while they offered some advantages for creating disinformation at scale, human beings are quite adapt at creating bullshit on their own.
What I missed was that people would WANT to consult them, knowingly, despite all their issues.
Most folks I know who are worried about AI aren’t worried about these programs becoming self aware and oppressing us. That’s not a thing. We’re worried about all the ways these systems will ramp up existing inequalities and further obliterate our shared reality as human beings. That’s already happening.
'I have long argued that fact-checking is anachronistic and should be abolished in favor of much more aggressive reality-checking and gaslight-fighting in the main news columns.'
“Fact-checking” is a feeble, inadequate way to respond to racist, antisemitic incitement
Recently here has been a lot of excitement around this paper by Piantadosi claiming that Chomsky's approach to language is now refuted by large language models (https://lingbuzz.net/lingbuzz/007180). And I am quite sympathetic to this idea, so I decided to give it a read. But... am I the only only one to find this paper deeply flawed? (1/4)
@freemo it took me a long time to choose a server! I eventually gravitated to qoto because I liked the description of it, it sounded like a place that respected free speech and was populated by people who largely wanted to do good and discuss their academic work.
Seems like I made a good choice!
#ChatGPT and the like aren’t even close to thinking.
“The tendency to view machines as people and become attached to them, combined with machines being developed with humanlike features, points to real risks of psychological entanglement with technology.”
No, no, no, God damnit, Washington Post, this is not a "new normal." The point you should be making is just how abnormal this is. But instead you quite literally normalize the criminal running for president.
Trump campaign prepares for ‘new normal’: Running under indictment https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/21/trump-2024-ny-case-republicans/
Knowledge in probability, statistics, and data science, with some programming skills as well. Curiosity is my main thing though.
Former academic and current quant trader.