@Strandjunker That's just wealth on papier as shares. This wealth ist also used to drive additional projects that feed many employers. With sone good ideas, hard work and some luck this is the way for everybody. Why this envy debate?
> That's just wealth on papier as shares.
So are bank notes, and yet it is just as real as any other form of wealth. You say this like this money is less real than someone else.
@freemo @Strandjunker There is a difference between shares and bank notes. The notes are immediately and always ready to be spent, shares are not and often shareholders are allowed to sell them. So, that's just "money" for the gallery which also can loose much value within a short period of time.
@freemo @CarKettner
Arguments about the "realness" of the wealth aside, most of the envy in the original thread is from (IMO) a zero-sum mentality, in other words the stock wealth is at the expense of the rest of us, like there's only so much pie and these guys are taking my piece too. I always find that idea amusing and wrong.
@Strandjunker
@freemo Yep, but unfortunately a widely held belief, sometimes only implicitly held, but held nonetheless.
Yup.. people seem to care more about having opinions (bad ones) as to how to solve problem than they care to actually understand problems.
I dont mind people being wrong, but the level of confidence with which people are wrong without exploring the topic in an educated way that bothers me the most.
@ambihelical
Thats completely false, neither stock, nor economies as a whole, are a zero sum game. Nor is it true that you can only make wealth off of stocks by taking wealth from others.
@CarKettner @Strandjunker