Show newer

@louis @freemo
here in germany (and i believe other places) you have x parties and after the vote a subset of them decides to enter a coalition for the legislative period. which makes them the government and all other parties the opposition.

@louis @freemo sure, if things get seperated into opposition and government you'll always have two groups.

@robryk @freemo @louis
> compute the probability (as a function of what vote you cast) that your vote will be the deciding one, and pick the vote where you like that distribution the most.

i'm not really good at math, but my gut feel says that this would get really interesting if everyone did this :)

@louis @freemo
well, if everyone votes in a two party system because they think others do as well, it likely will stay a two party system :)

i believe voting like this does act against the idea of democracy. the idea was to vote for things people personally want - not making a game theory problem out of it.

@freemo @louis depending on who you ask, yes. it's essentially the same argument as in the US: if you vote for some small party which lands below 5% (which are excluded from the bundestag) you weaken the "good" big parties which aren't AfD so you strengthen AfD who are evil nazis who will end democracy.

always reminds me of the famous osho quote: "Government by the people, of the people, for the people... but the people are retarded."

@freemo @louis believe me, it's a common argument here in germany with more than 5 parties having a substantial vote. if you vote for something else you are "throwing your vote away".

regarding people throwing a fit:
i think what happens is that people identify very strongly with certain parties that criticizing these parties is an attack at their ego. i believe that this happens more for progressive parties, as those often use emotional arguments (like "end of democracy"). at least much more often than conservatives.

A fun puzzle: If you drive halfway to mom's house at 30 mph, how fast do you need to go during the second half, such that the whole trip averages to 60 mph?

Guess without using pen and paper.

Then see the answer, which might surprise you:

longform.asmartbear.com/double

@sun If I remember correctly Nietzsche distinguished between pity and sympathy. Sympathy is the desire to help others while pity is pain you feel at someone else's wretchedness. So pity is not compassionate, it is actually a self centered and base emotion in his view. He is not against helping or caring for others. He says things like "Everyone should give to the poor but beggars should be abolished" because giving out of compassion is a higher act while giving to ease the pain you feel at a beggars wretchedness is abase act.

@theorytoe still not sure it's a happening tbh. might as well just be an op to have people riot to do more police state afterwards.

in any case, protests and riots today are retarded because of the 100% surveillance.

time to go absolutely blobdamn insane (writing an ASN.1 library)
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.