Collected Over Spread @collectedoverspread@qoto.org

"Colorado high court to hear case against Christian baker who refused to make LGBTQ-themed cake" by Colleen Slevin and Jesse Bedayn for Associated Press

https://apnews.com/article/colorado-baker-lbgtq-cakes-court-case-346930f66dbf451b84c0d72c5c7c2cc5

Specifically, someone ordered a pink cake with blue frosting (and no writing) to celebrate gender transition. This case is going to be interesting to watch. Personally I don't think this should be considered speech, assuming that the baker provides options for cake and frosting colors as a normal part of doing business.

If I had a nickel for every time I started sponsoring a #FOSS creativity tool after crappy pricing changes from proprietary competitors, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice. https://fund.godotengine.org/ #Godot #GodotEngine

Someone needs to make a #Bluesky #BlueskySocial -themed parody of "Mr. Blue Sky"

"The problems are these:

"We don’t have anything resembling a consensus on what 'cancel culture' is and we’re not having a serious discussion about defining it;

"We don’t have a consensus on how we reconcile the interests of speakers and responders, and we’re not making a serious attempt to reach one.

"We don’t have a consensus about what to do about it and we’re not trying to reach one."

"Our Fundamental Right To Shame And Shun The New York Times" by Ken White in The Popehat Report https://popehat.substack.com/p/our-fundamental-right-to-shame-and

#FreeSpeech #CancelCulture

Additional hashtag variations #303Creative #303CreativeLLCvElenis

Curious about the ramifications of the recent #303CreativevElenis #SCOTUS decision. Does it mean that I, as an atheist website designer, can refuse to create wedding websites with religious references? (This would not be based on the actual religion of the partners, only the content of the site.) Or what if I want to create websites for only same-sex couples? Must I have a sincerely-held religious belief to this effect or can I simply exercise my #FirstAmendment #1A right to not speak in certain situations?

I always had a distaste for Pinterest since it required you to login to view things, while #Twitter didn't. Now Pinterest doesn't require login (just found this out today, I'll admit) and Twitter does.

@test Seems like posts from Mastodon and similar Fediverse applications appear in the "microblog" in Kbin, which I guess makes sense, but I'm still not sure about this dichotomy.

Test post from Mastodon to the "Threadiverse" (Kbin) @test

Today #Twitter released much of the code used for their recommendation algorithm https://blog.twitter.com/engineering/en_us/topics/open-source/2023/twitter-recommendation-algorithm

An machine-learning system relies on both an algorithm and training data so I wonder exactly what insights can be gained from what's been made public (I'm definitely not an expert in this area so I invite corrections and clarifications here). Regardless, it's an unusual level of transparency for a major social-media platform.

#SocialMedia #RecommendationEngines #RecommendationAlgorithms

Is there a name for that stupid argument that goes something like, "There's no point in outlawing X because criminals who are intent on breaking the law a will find a way to get X anyway"? As if making X illegal won't make it harder to access, including to would-be criminals?

Yes, this remark is primarily motivated by recent events in the news (USA) but there are so many other things where this sort of argument comes up. I don't mean to say I support every sort of restriction that this is meant to argue against, but it's a poor argument most of the time.