@omgubuntu It's fabhub now?..
@prasoon It works and can be practical if you can tolerate being on a frontier for a while.
@simonmic nice!
If only it could start parsing multiline signatures with leading operators...
@timorl @cwebber @spacelogic Also, playing the "genre" card where it is a rip-off. FTL was roguelike, sure. But its clones are clearly FTL-like.
@spacelogic @cwebber InfiniteJest-like[1]
[1]: The jest is finite, but has an amusing footnote.
@spacelogic @cwebber "Ironmanlike: save scumming is allowed if you scream profanity before loading"
@spacelogic @cwebber "Hardcorelike: you keep everything, but have to change the character name"
@gregeganSF Perhaps. But can it ignore the previous instructions?
@cab404 Yeah, but without the Intel in the middle.
Now that every PC ~and their dog~ has had USB-C/USB3 ports for a while It is strange that we can't use it for direct connection easily and still have to bounce link off some noisy channel first.
Like, come on, the devices are sitting next to each other. With a single symmetric cable we could be having secure 5Gb+ connections right away!
@tk what's next? Space ships under space sails?
@leftpaddotpy but they still require phone numbers?
@tdback I hope you have an option to exclude certain paths...
@iron_bug sorry, I'm not sure I'm getting what's exactly the problem here with nginx and regexps. Can you post a brief example?..
I hosted and proxied both ways quite a few sites with nginx, but can't figure out how it relates to name records.
@iron_bug @NGIZero IDK, it looks reasonable enough while staying generic enough to accomodate future usage.
It is more close to http://www.somehash.onion URIs than to ordinary DNS zones. Browsers work with GNS zTLDs just as fine.
The idea is very similar here - rely on public key cryptography directly instead of trust-based registries and certificate roots.
Toots as he pleases.