@grumpy_website If it knows what to do, then it should just do that and not pester you with such trivialities.
@bascule Good. Can we please stop degrowthing ourselves back into caves now?
@Mastodon While it would be nice to have a way to avoid X, the crux is that lots of people are just migrating from one silo to another instead of adopting the Fediverse. And the officials are the regular people too.
@tristanC It is advent of hardware now! 🦾
@haskell `type String = [Char]`
@jack @marianoguerra ditto FSMs ![]()
@jack @marianoguerra "S-expressions are the well-known solution to every syntactic problem—neat, plausible, and wrong."
@wilfredh They usually do follow-ups, but in some lame way.
But to ask for clarification is rare indeed. They should do this more instead of smugly answering the wrong question.
@carnage4life You can replace some of the human workers. And in time will replace more. This is a non-negligible effect already and will get more profound with time.
@cbarbermd It was already known in 2019. Did we do something about it? Nope.
@tristanC Interesting.. My parts catalog only lists knobs with detents that have 32 or less steps...
And I'm fiddling with my nanokontrol knobs with 127 steps in less than a turn and find the resolution abysmal (for camera control).
I don't know about your case, but I think I will be going all in on resolution and normalize the range myself.
@wilfredh HTTP3 cometh!
(IPv6 enables wider QUIC adoption by making UDP hole-punching and the other connectivity hacks unnecessary)
Toots as he pleases.