Show newer

@freemo is that a different cops-kick-guy-out-of-ambulance story?

"Man" also means human in it's other meaning, HUman or MANkind... 

@freeschool @freemo $ man ls

@JuliusGoat Maybe. If that's what Rufo is trying to do, then it seems worth noting he doesn't seem to have accomplished much.

@ncweaver @robpike Use some kind of linter that checks for this.

I mean, this is sort of the equivalent of thinking "this will never fail" and forgetting to use a try/catch in c++; it's not like exceptions necessarily magically eliminate this bug, right? I guess like Java's system sort of forces it, but the linter is the rough equivalent of this.

I'm using exception-free c++ (weird, I know) and abseil.io/docs/cpp/guides/stat, which IIUC is like Go's error handling, more or less. My environment won't let me compile code if I forget to look at the returned status object. Seems to work pretty well.

@StillIRise1963 Oxman took responsibility for her mistakes and didn't threaten to sue BI. So that's a difference I guess.

@pilgrim @StillIRise1963 Don't be ridiculous, pilgrim. I didn't like Gay's or Magill's answers to Stefanik, but I don't think we have any reason to think this is true about either of them.

I appreciate Oxman owning her errors, I wish Gay had done that more in her op-ed rather than playing the victim. But you're being absurd.

@ncweaver @robpike there's a question about exceptions in the Q&A; he basically laughs off the idea of exceptions.

@JuliusGoat focusing on the messenger rather than the message is probably less useful.

@tab2space @Popehat @OliverUv And for good measure he throws in the canard about free speech only being a government thing.

@tab2space @Popehat @OliverUv Interestingly, you are linking to a substack-hosted article.😂 It argues quite compellingly against the "nazi bar" label.

I think the main argument here is problematic, though. It appears to be basically this: Substack's policies aren't exactly equal to the 1st ammendment, therefore they are BS ("puffery"). I don't get it.

@Randall well like even before 2014 there were a lot of Russians living there.

@randahl I suspect a much higher %age of people living in Crimea want to be part of Russia than people living in the Danelaw area want to be part of Denmark.

To me, I feel like there are other reasons why ceding Crimea is a bad idea right now. (It might be nice to have a proper referendum on this someday long after the violence stops, and free of little green men.)

@artemesia @georgetakei Additionally, taking somebody off the ballot for a crime for which they were not convicted is a bad look. Op's position really needs to maintain the high road in order to be legitimate.

@volkris @cpoliticditto@mas.to it does, in a sense; you don't seem to be responding to what I wrote. Can I clarify?

@volkris @cpoliticditto@mas.to which part of the excerpt? The excerpt seems to be saying they won't be demonetized. I think op is equating that with paying them; that seems ~reasonable. What's your take?

@Paulos_the_fog "This is not a war; this is a punishment beating pure and simple!" But then what is the alternative; what would they be doing differently if their goal was truly and purely just to make sure that Hamas could not do this sort of thing again? (Hamas has said they intend to, for whatever that is worth.) My point is that I think they'd be doing the same thing they're doing now.

On some level, who cares their actual intent; that's kind of a category error anyway.

Your point remains though about worms turning. This is yet another reason they really need to do this with minimal casualties, at least.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.