With the increased character limit and Markdown support, the native QOTO posting interface is going to be enough for most people, unless they’re specifically looking for a blogging platform.

I just can’t see how throttling back the character limit here in order to force people to use a different platform would be a good thing for anyone except that other platform.

Maybe we’re just dealing with a bit of a language mismatch here and talking at cross-purposes. If @farooqkz wants to boost Writefreely as a service to use in addition to QOTO, that’s fine. If the idea is to cut QOTO’s features in order to force people to use Writefreely, that’s not fine, unless @freemo decides he wants to go in that direction.

obi 🍍  
@farooqkz And? If that suggests that the writefreely posts shows directly up in the timeline, then the problem is already solved by qoto's increase...
Follow

@knottedthreads @freemo @obi

the idea is a writefreely instance and encouraging people to write long posts there. In what way, I am not sure.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.