@freemo They are pretty, we could pick which is the favourite, based on looks alone (as I never watch their programming).
For me the very center one. πΊ
But kind of creepy to show how focused the corporation is on placing only a certain phenotype of female on display on their airwaves.
@design_RG @freemo ummm i think fox sucks as much as the rest of the mainstram media.... but maybe do a little research before making assumptions. No they don't just employ attractive blonde actors. None of them are real journalists. Most are just political activists disguised as anchors getting paid to spew disinformation across the airwaves none worse than CNN...
@inverness01
Evidently there's not an easy source for photos if who is actually an anchor. I don't have cable TV so never watch any of the networks, but here's what a quick web search shows. Not quite the same, but not sure who is /isn't an anchor vs opinion vs commentator.
@design_RG @freemo
Oh that is simple. Absolutely no one on Fox news (or any other american news station) is an anchor. Every last one of them present opinion.
@freemo @SecondJon @design_RG yep but disguise it as βfactsβ
Some are worse than others and Fox is the worse on the right, and MSNBC is the worst on the left.. but yea for the most part I agree.
Thats not true, there are a ton of extremely right leaning news:
New York Post, Federalist, Daily Wire, you name it.
@freemo @SecondJon @design_RG lol .. you cannot be serious... a .i am speaking directly to television b. Right leaning is fraction of the in tv or print or online . If you think it is anywhere even close to balanced you are being intellectually dishonest. I would not call your examples as mainstream either . Maybe the post or Washington times but again YOU IN NO WAY CAN CLAIM IT IS ON LEVEL PLAYING FIELD