I'm being told on Twitter that vaccines are safe, they are very angry with me, not joking:
https://twitter.com/MaggieEThornton/status/1380652509405003776

@Coyote you’re doing good work🤣 I’d join you but I’m permanently suspended from Twitter. Every time I open the app there is this big banner that says “Welcome Back” but I can’t tweet and they zero’d out my followers and followed accounts.

@madmike

It's just confronting fools with their own stupidity. When both had "PhD" next to their names, and can't support a single scientific claim, it mostly says our educational system is garbage. But we all knew that... 😂

@Coyote

Probably would help if next time you dont lead in with that hydrochloride stupidity. Yea there are legitimate concerns with the vaccines as they were rushed past the usual safety checks. But your other comments destroyed your credibility.

@madmike

@freemo @Coyote HCQ works and is safe and many many deaths would have been prevented if it were more widely used. There have been epidemiologists and virologists saying as much. They’ve been kicked off of Twitter and YouTube.

@madmike @freemo @Coyote Yes you are right #hcqworks don't listen to scummo he is corrupt academic morally defunct, with god complex, works for government pathological liar as caught many times, just a human garbage that will pay at the end of scamdemic. Covid19 doesn't exist. Virus doesn't exist.
And if scummo says otherwise he can collect free money here samueleckert.net/isolat-truth- he won't because he is simply a liar.

thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/f

2020news.de/wp-content/uploads

swprs.org/why-covid-19-is-a-st

@akeno

Scummo could have all the evidence in the world and not be able to collect. Anyone who pulls the conspiracy theory bullshit that covid doesnt exist and hasnt been proven to exist doesnt know the first thing about the science of any of it.

@madmike @Coyote

@freemo @akeno @madmike

I know it exists, I've had it, still not breathing right. Got it last March, wish I would have got it now, when they know a bit more.

What's real though is, it's a rather small blip, flu sized so far, and I suspect more life-long damage than a typical flu. But still, it's no where near the scale they say it is, and until I see this data from our own country, I'm going to believe this scale is probably a reasonable representation:
https://twitter.com/VoidSurf1/status/1320269542174720000

@Moon @akeno @madmike @freemo @Coyote

> (C19 virus isolated)

Who has isolated it? Do you have a reference? I know _fragments_ of it have been shared, but the whole thing as such?

@vandys

It has been isolated but you need to be specific onw hat you truely mean by isolated.. If you truly mean that the virus is the only thing and no plasma, water, or anything else is present, then that would be literally impossible and unnecesary.. if by isolated you mean no other cell organels or significant structures present in the sample such then yes of course it has been.

The point isolation is a completely nonsensical term that has nothing to do with if we can identify if it is there.

If I put a chunk of gold ont he table no matter how pure i try to make it wont be absolutely pure, there will be 0.001% of other stuff, plus the air in the room, plus the oils on its surface.. but you'd be a fool to claim gold doesnt exist simply because you cant make a 100% pure sample of it.

Just as with gold we can isolate viruses more than adequately to identify them.

@Moon @akeno @madmike @Coyote

@freemo @vandys @Moon @akeno @madmike

That's kind of a hand waving way of saying what's happening.

Chemically, they take the sample, isolate DNA (RNA, whatever). Get what reads they can on it, endcaps, size. Then they blast it appart, so they can replicate the fragements at a much faster rate. Then they image it (or other detection) and see what all the fragements are. Then, with data crunch reassemble to the whole, which is only a confirmation of it's existance, and the amplification plays hell with any Quantitiative data, but does not invalidate the qualitative data resulting with a super hi confdence (higher accuracy of qualitative data WAS achieved by SACRIFICING quantitiative data, just how science needs to work sometimes).
Follow

@Coyote

Right, I didnt explain the full process, and your right right its rather involved and ultimately requires a few clever steps... but my point is when these anti-germ theory nincompoops come around they always talk about isolation.. in their mind they have this simplistic idea of a vial that has just the virus in it and noting else.. which as you probably know just makes no educated sense of any kind.

The processes you describe (and the details you didnt) all take place in a liquid soup that has a very high concentration of the virus but it isnt absolute pure (it doesnt need to be and that is impractical).. despite not being abolutely pure we can still "isolate" it in the sense of reading its dna and protein and identifying it.

@akeno @vandys @madmike @Moon

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.