@nanook i pulled one version that said 10k too, when i was last looking at the numbers. there's been argument from people screen capping this page that there is a 6k, 9k and 12k version going around.
@freemo @Pat @sergeantcat
@freemo @Pat @sergeantcat
@nanook no the goal post move is to say that vaers doesn't "count" because reasons. just like the heart and platelet issues didn't count because it's basically impossible to get vaxxers to accept anything as a reaction. i'm not sure how they even got myocardia on that list.
@Pat @freemo @sergeantcat
@Pat @freemo @sergeantcat
🇳🇱
Of course VARES counts. What you cant do is just say "hey look I added a all the numbers in this column and got this big number"... THAT is meaningless. If you want to infer things from VARES you need a based understanding of statistics to know how to pick out meaningful patterns. It isnt as simple as adding.
@freemo @nanook @sergeantcat @Pat
> vaccines are safe
> look at this database we made to prove how little incidents there are
> look at this yearly average
> now stop looking at the database because one of the columns has just exploded and its solely due to one newly approved thing
> quinn you just don't understand statistics
> vaccines are safe
> look at this database we made to prove how little incidents there are
> look at this yearly average
> now stop looking at the database because one of the columns has just exploded and its solely due to one newly approved thing
> quinn you just don't understand statistics
Follow
Come on now, I'm pretty sure your smarter than that.. Do you seriously not understand why you'd have to normalize for the total number of people being vaccinated as a absolute minimum to be useful?
Honestly if i thought you just didnt understand statistics I might not care.. but I have a feeling your smarter than the things your saying. You must realize how not normalizing the data for background rate is meaningless.
